Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Instinctive Drift01:05

Instinctive Drift

199
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
199

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Contextual cueing-Eye movements in rotated and recombined displays.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Editorial: Guidance of search by long-term and working memory.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Temporal order-dependent and -independent cortical representation of gaze sequences.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Dynamic face-related eye movement representations in the human ventral pathway.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Tonotopy is not preserved in a descending stage of auditory cortex.

eLife·2025
Same author

Limitations on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Users: A Compilation of Viewpoints.

Trends in hearing·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
07:26

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

9.3K

在人类和小鹿的概率性食过程中,留下斑块的差异性行为.

Lasse Güldener1, Parthiban Saravanakumar2, Max F K Happel2,3,4

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany. lasse.gueldener@ovgu.de.

Communications biology
|August 15, 2024
PubMed
概括

人类和大鼠面临着一个寻找食物的困境:什么时候离开耗尽资源的补丁. 人类的决定,不像大猩猩.

更多相关视频

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.6K
Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
04:56

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Published on: January 25, 2018

7.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
07:26

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

9.3K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.6K
Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
04:56

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Published on: January 25, 2018

7.9K

科学领域:

  • 行为生态学 行为生态学
  • 比较心理学比较心理学
  • 搜集食物理论 搜集食物理论

背景情况:

  • 动物必须平衡利用当前的资源与探索新的资源.
  • 离开补丁的决定对于最大限度地获取资源至关重要.
  • 环境因素和补丁质量影响食策略.

研究的目的:

  • 为了比较人类和 gerbil 补丁离开行为在类似的食任务.
  • 探讨不同物种的开发-探索困境背后的决策机制.
  • 评估对最佳食理论预测的遵守情况.

主要方法:

  • 人类执行视觉搜索任务;大鼠执行物理搜索任务.
  • 这两项任务都涉及带有指数级下降奖励的补丁.
  • 记录和分析了离开补丁的决定和放弃的时间.

主要成果:

  • 人类离开补丁的决定遵循基于奖励遇到的增量机制,与gerbils不同.
  • 这种人类策略被认为是最大限度地提高在可变环境中的奖励的最佳策略.
  • 这两种物种,当没有过度采集时,对收集率的下降表现出敏感性,与边际值定理保持一致.

结论:

  • 人类的食决策表现出一个更适应的,增量策略与大鼠相比.
  • 决策中的差异突出了对开发-勘探权衡的特定物种解决方案.
  • 这项研究引入了一种新的模式,用于跨物种对食行为的比较.