纠正对党派对手的错误看法在治疗民主疾病方面并不有效
Nicholas C Dias1,2, Laurits F Aarslew3, Kristian Vrede Skaaning Frederiksen3
1Annenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
PNAS nexus
|August 21, 2024
概括
纠正对立政党的误解并不能始终减少党派敌意或对政治暴力的支持. 有证据表明,这些干预措施不是民主衰退的可靠解决方案.
科学领域:
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 沟通研究 沟通研究
背景情况:
- 越来越多的党派敌意,对政治暴力的支持和不民主的做法威胁到美国的民主.
- 建议的解决方案是纠正对政治对手 (党外) 的误解的干预.
- 这些干预措施的稳定性和一致性受到质疑.
研究的目的:
- 评估纠正对外部党派的误解对党派敌意和支持非民主行为的有效性.
- 确定针对党外观的干预措施是否可以缓解民主衰退.
主要方法:
- 分析小组数据,以评估外部观点的可变性和稳定性.
- 来自12项研究的67项统计试验的元分析,以评估有关校正有效性的现有证据.
- 预先注册的实验,以测试改变对党外人口,政策和民主支持的看法的影响.
主要成果:
- 外方的看法高度变化且持有较弱,这表明纠正的影响有限.
- 分析显示,目前的纠正干预措施的有效性证据很弱.
- 对党外观的实验性操纵并没有始终影响党派敌意,支持政治暴力或支持非民主做法.
结论:
- 纠正对政治对手的错误看法并不是对根深蒂固的民主问题的充分解决方案.
- 这些发现挑战了基于信息的干预措施在减少党派敌意和促进民主稳定的有效性.
- 需要进一步的研究来确定更有效的策略来应对民主侵蚀.
更多相关视频
07:26The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
38.0K
08:53Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
9.6K
相关概念视频
Groupthink
44.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.3K
Beck's Cognitive Therapy
39
Cognitive therapy is a psychological approach designed to address distortions in thinking, which can lead to negative emotions and unrealistic beliefs. These cognitive distortions often influence how individuals interpret and respond to situations, exacerbating emotional distress. Below are some prevalent cognitive distortions, their characteristics, and examples of how they manifest in thought processes.
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
39
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.6K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.6K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
