婴儿配方粉和水测量的可变性和误差:一项实验研究
Richard R Rosenkranz1,2, Ana Gonzalez-Alvarez2,3, Chris Acosta1
1Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Frontiers in nutrition
|August 22, 2024
概括
护理人员准备的婴儿配方奶粉,特别是手动扫粉,显示了重大测量错误. 配方奶粉度中的这些不准确性可能会影响婴儿的健康和发育.
科学领域:
- 儿科 儿科 儿科
- 营养科学 营养科学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
背景情况:
- 配方养是不能母乳养的婴儿的关键替代品.
- 不适当的配方制备可能导致危险的稀释或度错误.
- 准确的婴儿配方制备对于婴儿健康至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 评估婴儿配方制备过程中护理人员测量的准确性.
- 为了比较不同条件下的测量精度与制造商规格.
主要方法:
- 84名护理人员参加了一项交叉实验研究.
- 参与者使用标准化和个人产品准备了4司和7司配方料.
- 线性混合效应模型分析了粉末和水的测量误差 (MAPE).
主要成果:
- 粉末测量 (9.0%) 的平均绝对百分比误差 (MAPE) 显著高于水 (4.4%).
- 粉末和水组合的MAPE达到了13.0%.
- 较大的错误发生在7司制剂和使用护理人员自己的产品时.
结论:
- 在护理人员婴儿配方制剂中存在显著的变化和错误.
- 手粉特别容易过度测量,可能会影响配方度.
- 确保准确的配方准备对于婴儿营养和安全至关重要.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
73.6K
Random and Systematic Errors
10.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.9K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
2.4K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.4K
Contaminants and Errors
85
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
85
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
38.0K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
38.0K


