Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

85
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
85
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry01:19

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

4.7K
Mass spectrometry is a powerful characterization technique that can identify and separate a wide variety of compounds ranging from chemical to biological entities, based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). The instruments that allow this detection, known as mass spectrometers, have three components: an ion source, a mass analyzer, and a detector. These spectrometers differ based on the nature of their ion source and analyzers.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is a commonly...
4.7K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Importance of Standardizing Laboratory Medicine in a Super-aging Society.

Public health weekly report·2026
Same author

Essential Data Elements for Laboratory Test Interoperability: An Expert Consensus-Based Framework.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

When Direct LDL Cholesterol Assays Fail: a Case Series of Analytically Implausible Results.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Proposal for Modified Alpha Fetoprotein Use in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: Analysis of the 2018-2020 National Cancer Screening Program.

Journal of Korean medical science·2026
Same author

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for therapeutic drug monitoring of treosulfan.

Laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Accuracy of Eight Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations for Assessing Kidney Function in Korean Pediatric Patients.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Interlaboratory Comparison of a Glucagon and Oxyntomodulin Immuno-LC-MS/MS Assay: Implications for Diabetes Research.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Information-Dependent Acquisition and Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra for Untargeted Drug Testing on a Linear Ion Trap-Pulsing Quadrupole-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Patterns of One-Year Change in HbA1c and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Metrics in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

TSH Pediatric Reference Intervals: Lack of CALIPER Applicability to US-Based Populations.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Rapid Detection of Hemoglobinopathy Variants Using One-Step Library Preparation and Nanopore Sequencing.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Editor's Note: Circulating Proteolytic Products of Carboxypeptidase N for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS
06:34

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS

Published on: July 11, 2016

17.9K

基于机器学习的样本错误识别在临床实验室测试中的错误检测:一项回顾性多中心研究

Hyeon Seok Seok1,2, Shinae Yu3, Kyung-Hwa Shin4

  • 1Interdisciplinary Program of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School, Chonnam National University, Yeosu, Republic of Korea.

Clinical chemistry
|August 22, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

机器学习模型显著改善了瘤标志物测试错误检测,在准确性和灵敏性方面表现优于传统方法. 这提高了诊断可靠性和实验室效率,特别是对于较小的设施.

更多相关视频

MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
08:14

MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening

Published on: October 26, 2017

15.6K
Automatic Separation and Collection of Cancer-Related Substances from Clinical Samples
08:49

Automatic Separation and Collection of Cancer-Related Substances from Clinical Samples

Published on: January 13, 2023

1.8K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS
06:34

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS

Published on: July 11, 2016

17.9K
MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening
08:14

MicroRNA Based Liquid Biopsy: The Experience of the Plasma miRNA Signature Classifier MSC for Lung Cancer Screening

Published on: October 26, 2017

15.6K
Automatic Separation and Collection of Cancer-Related Substances from Clinical Samples
08:49

Automatic Separation and Collection of Cancer-Related Substances from Clinical Samples

Published on: January 13, 2023

1.8K

科学领域:

  • 临床诊断 临床诊断 临床诊断
  • 实验室自动化 实验室自动化
  • 机器学习在医疗保健中的应用

背景情况:

  • 自动验证技术对于临床实验室的诊断准确性至关重要.
  • 传统方法缺乏错误检测的灵敏度和效率.
  • 瘤标志物测试需要强大的错误检测,以确保可靠的结果.

研究的目的:

  • 引入和评估基于机器学习 (ML) 的自动验证技术,用于增强瘤标志物测试错误检测.
  • 将ML模型的性能与传统的三角洲检查方法进行比较.

主要方法:

  • 在一个大数据集上训练并验证了ML模型 (397,751个训练样本,215,339个外部验证样本).
  • 模拟样本错误识别错误率为1%.
  • 使用贝叶斯优化优化并在多个机构中验证的优化ML模型.

主要成果:

  • 与传统方法 (0.705-0.816) 相比,深度神经网络和极端梯度增强实现了更高的ROC AUC (0.834-0.903).
  • 在外部验证中,ML模型表现出比传统模型 (0.670-0.773) 更高的平衡精度 (0.760-0.836).

结论:

  • 基于ML的自动验证显著改善了检测样本错误识别错误的情况.
  • 这些模型提供了一种多功能解决方案,以提高临床实验室的效率和可靠性,包括较小的实验室.
  • 这项研究为更可靠的临床实验室测试提供了一条道路.