评估中国大学在线课程资源分配的效率
Tian-Tian Zhu1, Fei Yang2, Yue-Jun Zhang3
1Education Science Research Institute, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China.
Evaluation and program planning
|August 25, 2024
概括
在中国,大学在线课程资源分配效率较低,人文学科和社会科学比自然科学做得更好. 教师的能力和课程内容显著影响效率,但整体生产力正在下降.
科学领域:
- 教育教育教育教育教育教育.
- 经济学 经济学 经济学
背景情况:
- 大学课程质量对于培养人才至关重要.
- 目前在中国大学的在线课程资源分配效率不足于最佳水平.
- 这种低效率背后的驱动机制尚不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 评估中国一所顶尖大学在线课程资源分配的效率.
- 确定影响这种效率的关键因素.
- 分析资源分配生产率的时间趋势.
主要方法:
- 数据环境分析 (DEA) - - 马尔奎斯特指数用于效率测量.
- 托比特回归模型用于分析影响因素.
- 使用来自H.大学iCourses平台的数据进行实证分析.
主要成果:
- 人文和社会科学课程的资源分配效率高于自然科学课程.
- 与非国家级优质课程相比,国家级优质在线课程的资源投资冗余性较低.
- 总的因素生产率通常会随着时间的推移呈现下降趋势,技术进步的创新效应显著,但技术效率的追赶效应不足.
结论:
- 规模效率是提高在线课程资源分配生产力的首要限制.
- 教师的研究指导能力,教学研究技能和所提供的课程数量是有效性的重要积极决定因素.
- 需要进行战略性改进,以提高在高等教育中在线课程资源分配的有效性.
相关概念视频
Surveys
14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Random Sampling Method
11.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
11.0K
Social Loafing
34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K


