Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

87
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
87
Bias01:22

Bias

3.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.9K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

182
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
182
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

64
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
64

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Making productive use of insider-outsider tensions in HPER.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same author

Accurate contextual reporting amidst dynamic AI curricula development: A response to Zainal and colleagues.

Medical education·2026
Same author

What are medical students really doing with GenAI in their self-study? An epistemic entanglement framework approach.

Medical teacher·2026
Same author

Optimising professional support for doctors who experience work performance issues: a realist evaluation.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same author

How Medical Students Negotiate Their Roles in the Figured World of Curriculum Co-Creation: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.

Perspectives on medical education·2026
Same author

How can authors address reflexivity in quantitative studies?

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Historicizing health professions education research: history as a strategic analytic resource.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing workplace collaboration and learning between resident doctors and senior nurses: a scoping review.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Grave lessons: a guide to historiographical research in health professions education.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of inquiry in medicine and nursing using Dewey's perspective.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

"Teaching is important, but it's not important": a qualitative study of teacher identity among early-career academics in health professions.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

The Moral Competence Test in healthcare education: a critique based on informal logic.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.7K

避免混合方法研究中常见的陷?

Patricia O'Sullivan1, Ayelet Kuper2, Jennifer Cleland3

  • 1University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. Patricia.OSullivan@ucsf.edu.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice
|August 26, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这本指南帮助学者通过为指导者提供分析方法来改善健康专业教育中的混合方法研究. 它强调了评估混合方法研究的关键要素,并解决了常见的报告缺陷.

科学领域:

  • 卫生专业教育研究 卫生专业教育研究
  • 混合方法研究方法研究方法.

背景情况:

  • 混合方法研究在卫生专业教育中越来越受欢迎.
  • 这种受欢迎程度为研究设计和解释带来了优势和挑战.
  • 学者们经常在有效地应用和分析混合方法方法方面遇到困难.

更多相关视频

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K
Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

3.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.7K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K
Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

3.9K