在更高层次的社交网络中,群体相互作用的时间动态
Iacopo Iacopini1,2,3, Márton Karsai4,5, Alain Barrat6
1Network Science Institute, Northeastern University London, London, E1W 1LP, United Kingdom. iacopo.iacopini@nulondon.ac.uk.
Nature communications
|August 27, 2024
概括
了解社会动态需要超越个人互动,看看群体行为. 这项研究揭示了群体如何形成,解散以及个人如何在群体之间移动的一致模式,并提出了一个模型来解释这些社交网络动态.
科学领域:
- 社交网络分析分析
- 复杂系统科学 复杂系统科学
- 人类行为研究研究人类行为的研究.
背景情况:
- 传统的网络分析侧重于对互动,限制了对群体动态的理解.
- 大多数社会互动都涉及到群体,需要更高层次的网络代表.
- 群体形成,进化和群体内个体运动的机制仍然未被充分探索.
研究的目的:
- 研究社会系统中群体形成和个人导航的时间动态.
- 描述个人如何在群体之间移动,以及群体如何形成和分解.
- 开发和验证社会群体进化的动态模型.
主要方法:
- 分析关于儿童和大学生之间的社会互动的经验数据.
- 在个人和团体层面检查时间动态.
- 开发一个动态模型来模拟和复制观察到的群体行为.
主要成果:
- 在组建和解散过程中识别出强大的,独立于背景的模式.
- 在不断变化的社会群体中对个体导航策略的描述.
- 一个动态模型的验证,该模型准确地重现了对群体动态的经验观测.
结论:
- 社会系统在群体动态中表现出可预测的模式,超出了对对互动.
- 提出的动态模型为理解社会群体的演变提供了一个框架.
- 进一步的研究可以探索群体动态对社交网络中发生的过程的影响.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Relationship Formation
39.9K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.9K
In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
2.1K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.1K
Social Loafing
34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group
13.1K
Interpersonal communication focuses on the exchange of messages between two people.
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
13.1K
Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K


