一个探索性的混合方法分析的因素,有助于学生的感知,在入门STEM课程的包容性
Alessandra M York1,2, Kathryn G Miller2, Michael J Cahill1
1Center for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.
CBE life sciences education
|August 28, 2024
概括
教师可以通过实施基于证据的教学实践和包容性政策来提高学生在STEM课程中的包容性. 学生对包容性的看法是复杂的,受学术因素的影响,在不同课程上有所不同.
科学领域:
- 在STEM教育方面.
- 教育心理学教育心理学
背景情况:
- 学生对包容性的看法对于公平的STEM教育至关重要.
- 了解影响这些感知的因素可以为教学策略提供信息.
研究的目的:
- 探索学生在入门STEM课程中对包容性的看法.
- 确定学生与包容性课堂环境相关联的关键因素.
主要方法:
- 学生评分和1930年学生的开放文本回复的混合方法分析.
- 对答案的定性编码,分为学术,身份和非特定类别.
- 在三个课程中对135名学生进行了纵向跟踪.
主要成果:
- 超过80%的学生回复引用了影响包容性的学术因素 (教师互动,课程政策).
- 大多数学术反应与基于证据的包容性教学实践保持一致.
- 学生认识到多种,往往不同,影响不同课程的包容性的因素.
结论:
- 教师通过各种教学策略和政策显著影响学生对包容性的看法.
- 解决学术因素是促进包容性STEM学习环境的关键.
- 对于教育工作者来说,认识到学生包容的复杂性和多方面的性质是必不可少的.
更多相关视频
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
3.9K
10:17Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024
982
相关概念视频
Case Studies
11.6K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K
Surveys
14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Stereotype Content Model
14.0K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.0K
