相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data

In Vivo Protocol of Controlled Subconcussive Head Impacts for the Validation of Field Study Data

Published on: April 18, 2019

冰外测试与男性青年冰球运动员在冰上的表现之间的关系冰上曲棍球运动员

Mark S Rice^1,2, Darren E R Warburton^3,4, Alejandro Gaytan-Gonzalez^3,4

¹Cognitive and Motor Learning (LEARN) Laboratory, Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Frontiers in sports and active living

|August 30, 2024

概括

冰外健身测试显著预测年轻男冰球运动员在冰上的表现. 这些发现有助于定制培训计划,以提高球员的发展和优化运动潜力.

科学领域:

运动科学运动科学运动科学
运动生理学运动生理学
青年运动员发展青年运动员发展

背景情况:

冰上曲棍球的表现依赖于身体健康和技术技能的复杂相互作用.
了解冰外身体能力和冰上表现之间的关系对于球员的发展至关重要.

研究的目的:

调查男性青年冰球运动员在冰外各种表现指标和冰上能力之间的相关性.
确定冰上表现的关键冰外预测因素.

主要方法:

11名小年级冰球运动员 (平均年龄9.8岁) 接受了两次测试:在冰外和在冰上.
冰外测试评估了有氧功率,无氧健身,肌肉力量,耐力,功率,速度和加速.
冰上测试评估了最大速度,加速度,敏捷性 (S转) 和射击速度.

主要成果:

33个冰外变量中有24个与至少一个冰上变量有显著的相关性.
十个冰外变量作为冰上表现的回归模型中的预测因素.
冲刺速度和加速度是最常见的预测因素,出现在11个模型中的4个模型中.

结论:

不同的冰外测量,包括有氧健身,无氧功率,力量,耐力,速度,加速和敏捷性,可以预测冰上冰球表现.
这些发现支持开发有针对性的培训计划,以优化球员的表现.
客观的冰外评估可以指导男性青年冰球队的定制培训和球员发展策略.

关键词:

冰上曲棍球冰上曲棍球在冰外进行测试.在冰上表现的表现预测指标是指预测指标.青少年球员青少年球员青少年球员

更多相关视频

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations

Published on: May 1, 2018

Importance of Jumping Ability in Handball Throwing Speed and Accuracy

Importance of Jumping Ability in Handball Throwing Speed and Accuracy

Published on: April 4, 2025

相关概念视频

Social Facilitation

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.