对废弃的造砂的生态毒理学评估以及不同分类系统的应用
Carlotta Alias1,2, Flavio Cioli3, Alessandro Abbà1,3
1B+LabNet-Environmental Sustainability Laboratory, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Integrated environmental assessment and management
|August 30, 2024
概括
整合工业废弃物液生物试验的生态毒理学数据至关重要. 这项研究发现,三种整合方法产生了类似的结果,根据毒性对样本进行分类,并表明未稀释的液对查有效.
科学领域:
- 环境科学 环境科学
- 生态毒理学 生态毒理学
- 废物管理 废物管理
背景情况:
- 评估工业废物样本对环境的危害需要整合各种毒性数据,这是一个重大挑战.
- 现有的工业废物浸出物评估方法往往缺乏综合毒性数据分析程序.
- 造废弃物砂泄漏物需要对回收和处置进行评估,需要进行严格的生态毒理学评估.
研究的目的:
- 解决关于整合工业废弃物浸出物生物试验的生态毒理学数据的知识差距.
- 用一系列标准化生物测试来评估造废弃物砂的毒性.
- 为了比较不同数据整合方法对废物毒性分类的有效性.
主要方法:
- 在25个废弃造厂的砂样上进行了漏试验 (UNI EN 12457-2).
- 使用标准化生物测试来评估漂白物:阿利维布里奥·菲舍里,大夫尼亚·马格纳和Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata.
- 毒性数据使用毒性分类系统,毒性测试电池综合指数和EcoScore系统进行了整合.
主要成果:
- 达芬尼亚大菌和Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata是最敏感的生物,分别影响68%和64%的未稀释样品.
- 稀释样本允许计算EC50值,在P. subcapitata的范围内高达2.5g/L.
- 这三种整合方法都产生了类似的分类,确定了三种无毒和两种高度有毒的样本;钢铁造厂的样本具有高度的毒性.
结论:
- 从多个生物测试中整合生态毒理学数据提供了一种可靠的方法来评估废物毒性.
- 在生物测试中使用未经稀释的液可以是一个具有成本效益和时间效率的选方法.
- 本研究表明,综合生态毒理学评估对于工业废物管理决策的价值.
关键词:
艾利维布里奥·菲舍里 (Aliivibrio fischeri) 是一个鱼类生物.生物测试是一种生物测试.达夫尼亚大 (Daphnia magna) 是一个大的植物.生态毒性 生态毒性伪虫菌子群的分类.更多相关视频
09:49Use of a Battery of Chemical and Ecotoxicological Methods for the Assessment of the Efficacy of Wastewater Treatment Processes to Remove Estrogenic Potency
Published on: September 11, 2016
14.1K
04:53Author Spotlight: Advances in Evaluating Human Lung Epithelial Cells' Response to Metal-Organic Frameworks
Published on: May 26, 2023
876
相关概念视频
Deleterious Substances in Aggregate
156
Deleterious substances in aggregates can be detrimental to the quality and durability of concrete. These substances include organic impurities like loam, which interfere with cement hydration and are usually present in the sand. These prevent a good bond between aggregate and cement paste. Organic impurities can be detected using the colorimetric test, where the darkness of a solution after agitation indicates the level of organic content.
Another type of impurity is clay and fine material that...
Another type of impurity is clay and fine material that...
156
Aggregates Classification
309
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
309
Design Example: Aggregate Gradation
91
The right type and quality of aggregates are crucial for concrete as they significantly influence its properties, mix proportions, and cost-effectiveness. If different sources are available for sand, the commonly used fine aggregate in concrete, the selection of sand is primarily based on its gradation.
The grading, or particle-size distribution, of sand is determined using sieve analysis, with standard sizes ranging from 150 μm to 10 mm (ASTM No. 100 sieve to 3⁄8 in. sieve). Sand is...
The grading, or particle-size distribution, of sand is determined using sieve analysis, with standard sizes ranging from 150 μm to 10 mm (ASTM No. 100 sieve to 3⁄8 in. sieve). Sand is...
91
Testing Water Quality
103
When the quality of water for concrete preparation is uncertain, its impact on the setting time of cement and compressive strength of mortar is assessed by comparison with de-ionized or distilled water benchmarks. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C1602 requires the setting times to be within 90 minutes of the control, British Standard (BS) 3146:1980 allows a 30-minute variance in the initial setting, while British Standards European Norm (BS EN) 1008 specifies initial setting...
103
