与创伤知情方法相关的法官的态度和经验:一项探索性研究
Eva McKinsey, Amelia Thorn1, Minjee Kristin Kim2
1Duke University School of Law, Duke University.
Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy
|September 5, 2024
概括
青少年法院的法官对创伤知情 (TI) 方法的态度比成人法院的法官更为积极. 实施IT政策和程序是司法系统更广泛采用的关键.
科学领域:
- 法律心理学 法律心理学
- 犯罪学 犯罪学
- 社会正义,社会正义.
背景情况:
- 在美国法院系统中采用创伤知情 (TI) 方法至关重要.
- 了解司法对IT实践的看法对于成功实施至关重要.
- 有限的研究存在于法官的态度和与TI的经验.
研究的目的:
- 探索法官对创伤知情实践的态度和经验.
- 确定影响司法机构采用TI方法的因素.
- 弥合有关IT司法视角的知识差距.
主要方法:
- 调查了北卡罗来纳州91名地区法院法官.
- 评估态度,使用创伤信息化实践 (TIP) 和创伤教育.
- 统计分析包括t测试,波桑回归和相关性分析.
主要成果:
- 少年法院的法官表现出比成人法院的法官更有利的TI态度和更大的创伤教育参与.
- 与政策和程序相关的创伤知情实践 (TIP) 显示了最低的参与率.
- 在有利的TI态度和对康复和恢复性正义目标的支持之间发现了积极的相关性.
结论:
- 增长领域包括加强成人刑事系统的TI支持,并实施与政策相关的TIP.
- 调查结果支持TI方法与不太惩罚性司法实践之间的联系.
- 信息技术的司法实践可以促进向更具变革性的司法系统转变.
更多相关视频
05:51Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 15, 2016
9.0K
09:55Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
12.4K
相关概念视频
Surveys
14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
Case Studies
11.6K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K
Ethics in Research
22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Obedience
32.8K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.8K
The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K
Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
