破坏健康虚假信息来源的信誉:突出低专业知识的优势
Briony Swire-Thompson1, Kristen Kilgallen1, Mitch Dobbs1
1Network Science Institute, Northeastern University.
Journal of experimental psychology. General
|September 5, 2024
概括
强调来源缺乏专业知识有效地减少了对健康错误信息的信任和其可信度. 这种方法被证明比纠正虚假信息更有效,并且随着时间的推移显示了持续的影响.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 公共卫生传播 公共卫生传播
- 信息科学 信息科学 信息科学
背景情况:
- 虚假信息对公众健康构成重大风险.
- 确定有效的策略来打击健康错误信息至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查可疑健康来源和其虚假信息的质疑方法.
- 评估强调来源专业知识与纠正错误信息的有效性.
主要方法:
- 三个预先注册的实验 (N=1568) 用美国样本使用癌症和疫苗信息.
- 干预措施包括纠正错误信息,突出低源专业知识,或两者兼而有之.
- 实验3包括接种疫苗/未接种疫苗的子组,利益冲突干预和1周的保留间隔.
主要成果:
- 突出低源专业知识同其他干预措施一样有效或更有效,减少对虚假信息的信念.
- 缺乏专业知识的干预措施优于对虚假信息进行纠正,以减少来源的可信度.
- 在1周内持续的信念变化仅在使用低专业知识干预的接种疫苗的参与者中观察到.
结论:
- 强调来源缺乏专业知识是事实检查人员和健康沟通人员的一种有效策略.
- 这种方法有效地减少了对健康错误信息的信任,并降低了来源的可信度.
- 持续改变信念的有效性可能在接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的人群之间有所不同.
相关概念视频
Health Literacy
4.0K
Health literacy is an individual's or a community's capacity to comprehend, receive, read, and use relevant healthcare information and services. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2018) defines health literacy as the cognitive and social skills that determine the ability of individuals to gain access to, understand, and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. As a result, the WHO helps individuals manage long-term health concerns, participate in preventative...
4.0K
The Availability Heuristic
5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
180
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
180
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
151
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
151
Routes of Persuasion
64.0K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
64.0K


