内部群体来源增强了关联性推理
Marius Boeltzig1,2, Mikael Johansson1, Inês Bramão3
1Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Communications psychology
|September 6, 2024
概括
人们从他们自己的群体 (内部群体) 提供的信息中得出更好的推断,而不是其他群体 (外部群体). 在情节性记忆中这种内组优势可能会加强两极分化的信念.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
背景情况:
- 插曲性记忆允许灵活地更新知识,通过从重叠事件中得出新的推断.
- 了解影响推理过程的因素对于认知科学至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查由内组来源提供的信息是否与外组来源相比提高了推断能力.
- 探索源监控在潜在的集团内部优势中的作用.
主要方法:
- 用美国人样本进行了三项研究.
- 参与者评估了他们对由内组和外组来源提供的事件进行间接关联的能力.
- 源监控资源的评估与内组/外组信息相关.
主要成果:
- 参与者表现出优越的推断能力,对事件由内组来源呈现超过外组来源 (研究1和3).
- 当来源不构成团队时,没有观察到这种集团内优势 (研究2).
- 研究结果表明,推断中的内组偏差与来源监测资源的差异分配之间存在联系.
结论:
- 群内信息促进推断过程,可能增强偏见信息的传播.
- 这种机制可能有助于维护和加强两极分化的信仰.
- 这项研究强调了情节性记忆和知识更新的社会调制.
更多相关视频
09:38Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: November 14, 2017
14.8K
04:44Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study
Published on: July 21, 2021
4.1K
相关概念视频
Associative Learning
317
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
Classical conditioning, also known...
317
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Inductive Reasoning
60.2K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.2K
Attribution Theory
12.9K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
12.9K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Deductive Reasoning
55.1K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.1K
