评估Fill-it-up设计,以使用随机临床试验中的历史对照数据,与两个手臂平行组设计
Stephanie Wied1, Martin Posch2, Ralf-Dieter Hilgers3
1Institute of Medical Statistics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. swied@ukaachen.de.
BMC medical research methodology
|September 9, 2024
概括
填充设计是一种新的两阶段临床试验方法,将历史对照与随机对照试验 (RCT) 整合在一起. 这种方法可以提高数据利用率,同时管理偏差风险,为复杂的研究场景提供灵活的解决方案.
科学领域:
- 临床试验方法论 临床试验方法论
- 生物统计学 生物统计学
- 流行病学 流行病学
背景情况:
- 越来越多的人对创新的临床研究设计的需求,以利用现有数据.
- 历史控制提供了有价值的信息,但引入了潜在的偏见.
- 需要将历史数据整合到新研究设计中的方法.
研究的目的:
- 介绍和评估Fill-it-up设计,这是一个两阶段的方法,结合了历史和随机控制.
- 评估该设计在I型错误率和统计功率方面的性能.
- 为在临床研究中利用历史数据提供框架.
主要方法:
- 填充式设计涉及初始等价性预测,以比较历史和随机对照.
- 如果确立了等价性,则将历史数据纳入;否则,将随机化扩展.
- 该研究调查了这种两阶段设计的样本大小要求和错误率.
主要成果:
- 填充式设计保持了5%的家庭智能错误率.
- 最大样本大小可以超过没有历史控制的单阶段设计.
- 对照组之间的异质性增加提高了最大样本大小.
结论:
- 填充设计是一种用于在临床试验中结合历史对照的频率主义方法.
- 由于可能更大的样本大小,需要强有力的先验信念.
- 在特殊情况下,作为混合设计的有价值的选择.
相关概念视频
Crossover Experiments
2.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.7K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
124
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
124
Randomized Experiments
6.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.8K
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Blinding
2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
162
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
162


