探索允许不兼容的信念在认知系统中共存的机制
Marija B Petrović1,2, Iris Žeželj1,2
1LIRA lab, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Psychological reports
|September 11, 2024
概括
人们可以持有矛盾的信念,这种现象被称为双重思维. 这种趋势与认知风格和非理性信念有关,但并不预测非证据基础的药物使用.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
背景情况:
- 个人经常认为人们寻求信念的一致性.
- 然而,观察到的是,他们支持相互不兼容的信仰 (双重思维).
- 了解双重思维的机制至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了调查双重思维的本质.
- 探索它与思维方式和非理性信仰的关系.
- 检查其与卫生实践和对当局的信任的联系.
主要方法:
- 两项预先注册的研究,共有691名参与者.
- 评估思维风格 (理性/直觉,积极开放,需要认知封闭).
- 评估了不合理的信念,健康实践和对科学/普通人的信任.
主要成果:
- 双重思维与需要认知封闭和非理性的信念正相关.
- 双重思维与积极开放思维负面相关.
- 没有显著的预测非基于证据的药物使用或双重使用.
结论:
- 双重思维允许不兼容的权利要求进入认知系统.
- 信念似乎是分隔的,缺乏交叉引用.
- 不基于证据的信念不论内容如何,都会持续存在.
更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
5.3K
相关概念视频
Cognitive Dissonance
32.5K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.5K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Reason and Intuition
6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion
709
Richard Lazarus' cognitive mediational theory highlights the pivotal role of cognitive appraisal in shaping emotional responses. According to this theory, the evaluation of a stimulus — based on personal values, goals, beliefs, and expectations — mediates the emotional response. This appraisal process is immediate and often occurs unconsciously, influencing the intensity and nature of the resulting emotion.
Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Response
Lazarus proposed that...
Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Response
Lazarus proposed that...
709
Schemas
11.6K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
11.6K
