改变初级研究传播的范式
Ashley Farley1, Kazuhiro Hayashi2, Eva Hnatkova3
1Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Wellcome open research
|September 13, 2024
概括
目前的研究出版系统缺乏公平性和效率. 开放研究中心 (ORC) 旨在改善研究传播,为更负责任和透明的系统提供宝贵的经验教训.
科学领域:
- 学术传播学术交流
- 研究传播研究传播.
- 科学出版系统 科学出版系统
背景情况:
- 主导的研究出版模式本质上是不公平和低效的,阻碍了知识的进步和社会利益.
- 开放研究中心 (ORC) 成立的目的是从根本上重新思考研究传播,促进信任,透明度和公平参与.
- 该非营利组织经营了五年,在解散之前产生了重要的产出和见解.
研究的目的:
- 分享开放研究中心 (ORC) 的经验和教训,以帮助其他人开发一个负责任的研究传播系统.
- 突出全球性,跨利益相关者合作在验证和传播研究的持续需要.
- 探索在当前的研究和资金格局中培养集体声音和行动的挑战.
主要方法:
- 对开放研究中心 (ORC) 运营成果和学习的回顾性分析.
- 对建立统一研究验证和传播方法所面临的挑战进行定性探索.
- 一个非营利性的倡议努力改革学术交流的案例研究.
主要成果:
- 经过五年的ORC运作,对改革研究传播产生了宝贵的见解.
- 该倡议展示了替代模型的潜力,以促进信任和透明度.
- 由于当前的环境,在创建集体,跨利益相关方的方法方面仍然存在重大挑战.
结论:
- ORC的经验为未来的倡议提供了基础,旨在建立一个更公平的研究出版系统.
- 持续的全球对话和试点解决方案对于推动研究验证和传播至关重要.
- 克服系统性障碍和资金限制对于在学术传播改革中实现集体行动至关重要.
更多相关视频
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
11.8K
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
1.3K
相关概念视频
01:56Ethics in Research
22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
01:40Archival Research
16.0K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.0K
02:40The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K
01:22Case Studies
11.6K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K
02:20Longitudinal Research
11.9K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
11.9K
01:50Cross-Sectional Research
11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K