Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.2K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.2K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

324
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
324
Random Error01:04

Random Error

848
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
848
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

85
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
85
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.5K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Smartphone-based support for early childhood development in a rural low-resource setting: an individually randomised pilot feasibility trial from Guatemala.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
Same author

Response to: "Methodological limitations and conflicts of interest in spinal cord stimulation research impair trustworthiness".

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine·2026
Same author

Effect of water temperature on life history traits of Radix natalensis, the intermediate host of Fasciola gigantica.

BMC veterinary research·2026
Same author

Understanding implementation of HEARTS for hypertension and diabetes in Guatemala: Qualitative and mixed-methods pilot results.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Mind-Body Therapies for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in People with Cancer: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis.

Current oncology reports·2026
Same author

CFTR modulator monotherapy for people with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del).

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Impact of mode of birth and perinatal antibiotics on infant gut microbiota and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
Same journal

Ecological validity framework and neurodevelopmental disabilities: applications for parent training programmes.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
Same journal

Development of age-specific and sex-specific blood pressure norms and their associations with lipid profile in children aged 6-16 years from urban Bengaluru: a cross-sectional study.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
Same journal

Appropriateness of paediatric vitamin prescribing in Vietnamese outpatient settings: associated factors.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
Same journal

Precision for all children: embedding equity into precision medicine for children.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
Same journal

Barriers to adoption of respiratory function monitors in neonatal resuscitation.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

统计和方法中的常见错误

Peter Flom1, Katie Harron2, Javier Ballesteros3,4

  • 1Peter Flom Consulting, New York, New York, USA peterflomconsulting@mindspring.com.

BMJ paediatrics open
|September 16, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

BMJ儿科公开的统计评论员在提交的研究中发现了常见的错误. 本指南提供修正,以提高已发表的儿科研究的质量和稳定性.

关键词:
统计 统计 统计 统计

更多相关视频

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.0K

科学领域:

  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 医学研究方法学 医学研究方法学
  • 儿科研究 儿科研究

背景情况:

  • 在提交给BMJ Open (BMJPO) 的手稿中经常观察到方法和统计错误.
  • 解决这些错误对于保持科学出版的高标准至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 编制儿科研究报告中常见的统计和方法错误列表.
  • 为作者提出适当的纠正和最佳实践,以加强研究报告.

主要方法:

  • 在BMJPO的统计评论员和编辑中进行了一项调查.
  • 该调查的目的是收集"物"和统计报告中最佳实践的例子.

主要成果:

  • 常见的错误被分为七个部分:图形,统计显著性,呈现,因果关系,模型构建,元分析和各种.
  • 为这些错误提供了解释和简短的纠正.

结论:

  • 该指南旨在协助作者准备提交材料,从而在儿科期刊上提供更高质量和更强大的研究报告.
  • 实施这些建议可以提高已发表的儿科研究的整体科学严谨性.