相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Plant Organellar DNA Enrichment Methods Suitable for Next-generation Sequencing

Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Plant Organellar DNA Enrichment Methods Suitable for Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: July 28, 2017

基于完整的 хлоропласт基因组序列的基础上,对Lasianthus物种进行了全面的比较分析和分子标记的开发

Yue Zhang¹, Meifang Song¹, Deying Tang¹

¹Yunnan Key Laboratory of Southern Medicine Utilization, Yunnan Branch of Institute of Medicinal Plant Development Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Jinghong, 666100, China.

BMC plant biology

|September 16, 2024

概括

准确识别Lasianthus物种是一个挑战. 这项研究对四个Lasianthus chloroplast基因组进行了测序,并确定ITS2 + psaI-ycf4是精确物种识别的最佳DNA条形码.

科学领域:

植物基因组学植物基因组学
分子植物学分子植物学
医学植物学医学植物学

背景情况:

类植物在中国传统医学中至关重要,但由于形态相似,经常被误认.
现有的DNA条形编码方法难以准确地区分Lasianthus物种.
完整的叶绿体 (CP) 基因组为物种识别提供了更强大的方法.

研究的目的:

测序和分析四种Lasianthus物种的完整的叶绿体基因组.
开发改进的分子方法,以准确识别Lasianthus物种.
构建一个完整的Rubiaceae家族的遗传树.

主要方法:

使用高通量Illumina测序,获得了四种Lasianthus物种的完整CP基因组.
对获得的CP基因组和公开可用的数据进行了比较基因组分析.
选了可变区域,并使用各种条形码片段评估了它们的识别效率.
用49种Rubiaceae物种的CP基因组序列构建了家族遗传树.

主要成果:

四个Lasianthus CP基因组表现出典型的四部分结构,其大小从160,164到160,246 bp.
虽然基因顺序和GC含量相似,但观察到基因和区域长度的变化.
组合碎片"ITS2 + psaI-ycf4"被确定为用于验证Lasianthus物种真实性的最佳条形码.
对比分析显示,编码区域比非编码区域更为保守,其中ycf1显示出显著的差异.

结论:

这项研究提供了首次对四个Lasianthus chloroplast基因组进行详细分析.
"ITS2 + psaI-ycf4"片段组合被证实是用于识别Lasianthus的最有效的条形码.
该研究为Rubiaceae家族提供了一个全面的家族遗传树,帮助未来的物种识别和遗传多样性的研究.

关键词:

这种植物叫做Lasianthus.叶绿体基因组的基因组遗传学关系遗传学关系罗比亚科 (Rubiaceae) 是一个植物.种类识别种类识别种类识别

更多相关视频

Exploring the Root Microbiome: Extracting Bacterial Community Data from the Soil, Rhizosphere, and Root Endosphere

Exploring the Root Microbiome: Extracting Bacterial Community Data from the Soil, Rhizosphere, and Root Endosphere

Published on: May 2, 2018

Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics

Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics

Published on: January 25, 2019

相关概念视频

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...