在六周内进行两次证据综合 - - 一个试点项目的经验和评估
Heather Melanie R Ames1, Hege Kornør2, Line Holtet Evensen2
1The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), PO Box 222, Oslo, Skøyen, 0213, Norway. heather.ames@fhi.no.
BMC medical research methodology
|September 16, 2024
概括
研究人员通过密集工作,在六周内成功完成了证据综合. 这种专注的方法提高了生产力和时间的使用,尽管未来的实施需要仔细规划.
科学领域:
- 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
- 证据综合方法论的方法论
背景情况:
- 组织面临着为专员提供快速证据综合的压力.
- 一个试点项目测试了密集的六周证据综合过程,与典型的4-6个月时间表形成鲜明对比.
研究的目的:
- 探索研究人员在证据综合上密集工作的经验.
- 确定阻碍和促进密集证据综合工作的障碍和促进者.
- 为系统引入密集的证据综合方法提供信息.
主要方法:
- 一项试点研究涉及一个密集的工作组和两个选定的委员会.
- 该过程分为规划和密集阶段,利用数字工具和同行评审人员.
- 审查团队已经定义了角色 (团队领导,流程领导,领导联系人) 并参与了反思会议.
主要成果:
- 与专员的早期接触澄清了项目范围和标准,使得协议开发成为可能.
- 这两项审查都按计划完成,其中一项根据研究可用性的范围进行了调整.
- 机器学习工具加速了研究选择,过程领导角色提供了有价值的结构.
结论:
- 密集的过程提高了对短期成果的关注度和生产力.
- 研究人员更喜欢集中工作在一个单一的证据合成更好的时间效率.
- 实施密集证据综合的含义需要在广泛采用之前仔细考虑.
更多相关视频
07:59Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
7.9K
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
1.3K
相关概念视频
01:13Psychology as a Science
682
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
682
02:40The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K
01:22Case Studies
11.6K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K
01:52Persuasion Strategies
38.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.6K
01:56Ethics in Research
22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
01:50Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K