Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

RNA Editing02:23

RNA Editing

8.9K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
8.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

MAD-MT Score: A Tool to Optimize Patient Selection for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Distal Vessel Occlusions.

Stroke·2026
Same authorSame journal

The integrity of the Circle of Willis predicted hemodynamic changes after bypass surgery in Moyamoya disease: a prospective cohort study by 4D flow MRI.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Territorial heterogeneity of atherosclerosis and vascular calcification.

Nature cardiovascular research·2026
Same author

Neutral Cervical Spine MRI is Not Enough: The Critical Role of Flexion Imaging in Hirayama disease in Pediatric Patients.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Neuroradiology Leads NIH Funding Among Clinician Diagnostic Radiologists: A 14-Year National Analysis.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

A Systematic Evaluation of Image Preprocessing in Deep Learning Detection and Segmentation of Intracranial Metastatic Disease.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

787

人工智能产生的放射学社论:专家编辑可以检测它们吗?

Burak Berksu Ozkara1, Alexandre Boutet2, Bryan A Comstock3

  • 1From the Department of Neuroradiology (B.B.O., M.W.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston, Texas.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
|September 17, 2024
PubMed
概括

GPT-4可以生成高质量的放射学社论,这些社论可能会逃避检测. 然而,编辑们更喜欢人类撰写的内容,这表明科学写作评价存在偏见.

更多相关视频

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.8K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

787
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.8K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.7K

科学领域:

  • 人工智能在科学写作中的作用
  • 放射学 编辑 内容生成 内容生成
  • 在学术界自然语言处理.

背景情况:

  • 像GPT-4这样的人工智能 (AI) 模型可以产生类似人类的文本.
  • 人工智能编写科学内容的能力需要对其现实世界的适用性进行评估.

研究的目的:

  • 评估GPT-4生成放射学社论的能力.
  • 将人工智能生成的社论与人类撰写的社论进行比较.
  • 确定人工智能生成的科学内容的可检测性和可发布性.

主要方法:

  • GPT-4基于人类撰写的摘要生成了16篇社论.
  • 六位经验丰富的编辑使用利克特尺度和作者确定 (未配对和配对设置) 来评估文章.
  • 文章使用AI检测和抄袭软件进行分析.

主要成果:

  • 人工智能撰写的文章的中位数AI概率得分为58%,而人类撰写的文章为2.0%.
  • 在配对的设置中,作者分类的准确性达到70%.
  • 编辑更喜欢发表由人类撰写的文章 (82%),当被认为是人类撰写的文章时,他们的评分更高.

结论:

  • GPT-4产生高质量的,无抄袭的社论,这些社论很难用当前的工具来检测.
  • 人工智能生成的内容可能会被发布,但面临着编辑对人类撰写作品的偏见.
  • 检测工具在识别人工智能生成的科学文本方面有效性有限.