经济公平与残疾人:开发和描述一个新的指数
Bhavneet Walia1, Katherine McDonald2, Joy Hammel3
1Public Health, Falk College, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
American journal of economics and sociology
|September 18, 2024
概括
新的经济机会指数揭示了残疾人的差异. 这些措施突出了国家内部和国家之间的差异,为经济公平的政策提供了信息.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 经济学 经济学 经济学
- 关于残疾人的研究.
背景情况:
- 对于残疾人来说,经济差距仍然存在.
- 现有的指标并不能完全捕捉到这一群体的经济机会细微差别.
- 国家政策和国家特定因素影响残疾人的经济成果.
研究的目的:
- 引入两个新的指数:ADA PARC绝对经济机会指数和ADA PARC相对经济机会指数.
- 为了能够详细检查美国各州内和各州内的残疾人经济公平.
- 为了解和解决经济差异提供一个基本的工具.
主要方法:
- 使用聚合经济指标开发两个复合社会指数.
- 利用美国人口普查和其他相关人口经济数据.
- 分析经济机会数据,按残疾状况和地理位置进行分类.
主要成果:
- 这些指数提供了关于残疾人和无残疾人之间的经济差异的新见解.
- 在各州的绝对和相对经济机会指数之间发现了中等的正相关性.
- 研究结果表明,共同和独特的因素都会影响残疾人的经济机会.
结论:
- 开发的指数是美国首个此类指数,解决了经济公平研究中的关键差距.
- 残疾人的经济机会受到各种因素的复杂相互作用的影响.
- 该研究确定了对残疾人经济机会较低的国家的政策影响.
更多相关视频
11:35The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
57.9K
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
718
相关概念视频
Intellectual Disability
44
Intellectual disability (ID) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in intellectual and adaptive functioning that manifest during the developmental period. This condition encompasses challenges in reasoning, memory, problem-solving, and learning, accompanied by impairments in everyday life skills, such as communication, self-care, and social interactions. Intellectual disability affects approximately 1% of the population in the United States, impacting an estimated 5...
44
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.1K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.1K
Econometric Views (EViews)
122
Econometric Views, often stylized as EViews, is a package that merges statistical analysis with econometric studies. It is designed to provide tools for time series analysis, forecasting, and econometric model simulation. The software originated from MicroTSP software and has evolved significantly since its inception in 1981. The history of EViews is marked by a continuous effort to enhance its computational speed and user interface. It was initially developed for large computing systems but...
122
Actuarial Approach
64
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
64
Stereotype Content Model
14.0K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
168
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
168
