干预措施在减少草食野生鸟类和哺乳动物对农作物的破坏方面有多有效? 一个系统审查协议
Ann Eklund1, Johan Månsson2, Jens Frank2
1Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 730 91, Riddarhyttan, Sweden. ann.eklund@slu.se.
Environmental evidence
|September 18, 2024
概括
这一系统性审查评估了减少野生食草动物对作物损害的干预措施. 它综合了各种方法在保护农业产量免受野生动物影响方面的有效性.
科学领域:
- 野生动物保护科学 野生动物保护科学
- 农业生态学 农业生态学
- 环境管理环境管理
背景情况:
- 野生动植物和食草动物对农作物的破坏带来了重大的经济和保护挑战.
- 现有的技术干预措施,以减轻这些损害往往缺乏全面的有效性评估.
- 对干预疗效的元分析很少,强调需要系统的证据综合.
研究的目的:
- 系统地审查和综合评估的干预措施的有效性,以减少草食野生鸟类和哺乳动物对作物造成的破坏.
- 确定哪些干预措施在减轻野生动物对农业实践和生计的影响方面最有效.
主要方法:
- 在Scopus和动物记录数据库中使用PICO框架进行系统的文献搜索.
- 纳入标准侧重于研究,比较干预设置与控制设置,以减少损害.
- 对包括的文章进行七种偏差类型的批判性评估,然后进行叙事和定量综合 (包括森林地块和可行性的元回归).
主要成果:
- 在符合条件的研究中进行了数据提取和偏差风险评估.
- 结果将通过叙事综合和,如果可能的话,使用总结统计和森林地块进行定量综合来呈现.
- 潜在的元回归分析,以探索影响干预有效性的因素.
结论:
- 审查议定书概述了一种严格的方法来评估对野生动物作物损害的干预措施的有效性.
- 调查结果将提供关键证据,为保护战略和农业管理实践提供信息.
- 本系统性审查旨在填补元分析中的空白,提供对干预疗效的全面了解.
相关概念视频
Conservation of Declining Populations
9.6K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
9.6K
Threats to Biodiversity
22.2K
There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
22.2K
What is Conservation Biology?
18.4K
Conservation biology is a scientific field that focuses on the preservation of biodiversity in order to protect ecosystems while meeting the needs of the human population. Humans require properly functioning ecosystems to maintain our supply of natural resources, including food, medicines, and building materials.
18.4K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
27.6K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
27.6K
Defenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores
23.3K
Plants present a rich source of nutrients for many organisms, making it a target for herbivores and infectious agents. Plants, though lacking a proper immune system, have developed an array of constitutive and inducible defenses to fend off these attacks.
23.3K
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.1K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.1K


