围产期体重偏差:综合性审查
Heather M Bradford1, Rebecca M Puhl2, Julia C Phillippi3
1Georgetown University School of Nursing, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)
|September 19, 2024
概括
围产期护理中的体重偏差很普遍,对孕妇和产后患者产生负面影响. 解决这种偏见对于改善母亲和心理健康结果至关重要.
科学领域:
- 围产期健康 围产期健康
- 健康心理学 心理健康心理学
- 医学社会学 医学社会学
背景情况:
- 在医疗保健环境中,体重偏差会对健康行为,医疗保健准入和结果产生负面影响.
- 这种偏见在围产期对于体重较高的人来说尤其令人担忧.
研究的目的:
- 对围产期护理提供者和学生之间体重偏差的现有文献进行审查.
- 探索怀孕,分娩和产后个体的体重偏差经验.
- 检查体重偏差经验与围产期/精神健康结果之间的关联.
主要方法:
- 在CINAHL,PubMed和PsycINFO数据库中进行系统的文献搜索.
- 使用了PRISMA,约翰霍普金斯EBP模型和惠特莫尔和Knafl框架.
- 包括来自六个国家的22个出版物,研究设计多样化.
主要成果:
- 在产前期,包括从护理提供者那里发现了明显体重偏差的普遍来源.
- 体重偏差的经历与孕妇和产后个体的不良产周和心理健康结果有关.
结论:
- 本次审查突出了关于围产期护理中体重偏差的重大知识差距.
- 体重偏差会对围产期和心理健康结果产生负面影响.
- 未来的研究应该调查提供者偏见的人口因素及其临床影响.
相关概念视频
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Bias
3.8K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.8K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
168
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
168


