Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

180
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
180
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

1.9K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
1.9K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.2K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

26.2K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
26.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Is Ockham's razor losing its edge? New perspectives on the principle of model parsimony.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

The e-posterior.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2023
Same author

Why optional stopping can be a problem for Bayesians.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2020
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Detecting Estrogenic Ligands in Personal Care Products using a Yeast Estrogen Screen Optimized for the Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory
14:13

Detecting Estrogenic Ligands in Personal Care Products using a Yeast Estrogen Screen Optimized for the Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory

Published on: January 1, 2018

13.1K

超越Neyman-Pearson:E值可以通过数据驱动的alpha来测试假设.

Peter D Grünwald1,2

  • 1Machine Learning Group, National research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands (Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica), Amsterdam 1098 XG, The Netherlands.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|September 20, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

该研究介绍了e值作为统计假设测试中P值的优越替代品. 电子值提供了更好的决策,特别是极端数据,并为I型和II型错误提供了强大的风险控制.

关键词:
信心 信心 信心 信心 信心决策理论 决策理论电子值的使用情况.证据 证据 证据 证据 证据 证据 证据假设测试 测试 假设测试

更多相关视频

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.0K
An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

22.8K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Detecting Estrogenic Ligands in Personal Care Products using a Yeast Estrogen Screen Optimized for the Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory
14:13

Detecting Estrogenic Ligands in Personal Care Products using a Yeast Estrogen Screen Optimized for the Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory

Published on: January 1, 2018

13.1K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.0K
An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

22.8K

科学领域:

  • 统计 统计 统计 统计
  • 统计学假设测试 统计学假设测试

背景情况:

  • 传统的假设测试依赖于P值,P值在决策中具有极端观察的局限性.
  • 目前的方法缺乏明确的指导来优化数据观察后的频率决策.

研究的目的:

  • 为了证明在统计假设测试中使用e值而不是P值的优势.
  • 突出电子价值如何促进后期设置中更好的决策和风险控制.

主要方法:

  • 该研究提出并分析了在一个概括的尼曼-皮尔森框架内使用e值的情况.
  • 它探讨了基于电子价值的决策规则,用于控制I型和II型风险.
  • 这项研究将应用范围扩展到电子信任集和电子后台,以获得有效的风险保证.

主要成果:

  • 电子值提供了简单的I型风险控制,并使更好的频率决策成为可能,特别是在极端数据的情况下.
  • 在考虑II型风险的后期设置中,基于电子价值的规则是唯一可接受的决策规则.
  • 电子信任集和电子后期提供有效的风险担保,当损失函数没有事先确定时.

结论:

  • 对于统计假设测试和决策,E值比P值显著提升.
  • 它们的应用确保了在各种场景中有效的风险控制,包括事后分析以及当损失函数灵活时.
  • 进一步开发和部署电子价值观对于在统计实践中更广泛采用至关重要.