Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

148
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
148
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.2K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.2K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

213
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
213
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.0K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.0K
Goodness-of-Fit Test01:16

Goodness-of-Fit Test

3.3K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
3.3K
Variation01:19

Variation

6.8K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
6.8K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Cell Cycle Sensing Shapes Human T Cell Fate and Exhaustion Programs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Wavelet Decomposition-Based Genomic Analysis of the Human Electrocardiogram.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Quantifying Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Resilience: A Screening and Composite Score Framework.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Structure-preserving multivariate hypothesis testing for mass spectrometry imaging and single-cell data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Temporal and spatial composition of the tumor microenvironment predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic TNBC.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

Prognostic pan-cancer and single-cancer models: A large-scale analysis using a real-world clinico-genomic database.

PloS one·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

交叉验证:它估计了什么,它做得有多好?

Stephen Bates1, Trevor Hastie2, Robert Tibshirani3

  • 1Depts. of Statistics and EECS, Univ. of California, Berkeley.

Journal of the American Statistical Association
|September 23, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

交叉验证估计了新数据的平均预测误差,而不是当前模型. 嵌套交叉验证可以提高预测准确性的置信区间,特别是在数据分割时.

更多相关视频

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

19.9K
Design and Evaluation of Smart Glasses for Food Intake and Physical Activity Classification
07:47

Design and Evaluation of Smart Glasses for Food Intake and Physical Activity Classification

Published on: February 14, 2018

11.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

19.9K
Design and Evaluation of Smart Glasses for Food Intake and Physical Activity Classification
07:47

Design and Evaluation of Smart Glasses for Food Intake and Physical Activity Classification

Published on: February 14, 2018

11.2K

科学领域:

  • 统计 统计 统计 统计
  • 机器学习 机器学习
  • 计算统计学 计算统计学

背景情况:

  • 交叉验证是机器学习中估计预测错误的标准方法.
  • 其精确的行为和解释,特别是对于线性模型,尚未完全理解.
  • 现有的方法可能会提供误导性的预测误差和置信区间估计.

研究的目的:

  • 为了澄清什么预测错误交叉验证真正估计.
  • 为了调查从交叉验证中得出的置信区间的准确性.
  • 为可靠的预测错误估计提出改进的方法.

主要方法:

  • 对线性模型的交叉验证的理论分析.
  • 对各种预测错误估计技术的实证评估,包括数据分割和引导.
  • 嵌套交叉验证方案的开发和测试.

主要成果:

  • 交叉验证估计了不同训练集的平均预测误差,而不是在当前数据上训练的特定模型.
  • 来自交叉验证的标准置信区间往往表现出不充分的覆盖.
  • 嵌套交叉验证提供了更准确的差异估计和可靠的置信区间.

结论:

  • 对交叉验证估计的解释需要仔细考虑.
  • 嵌套交叉验证是评估预测错误和构建置信区间的更强大的方法.
  • 在分割后对组合数据重新装配模型会使置信区间无效.