在线利用名义群体技术,在不同地理位置收集共识意见
Anthony Bruce Fallon1, Christine O'Connell
1Dr. Fallon: Research Officer The University of Queensland, Southern Queensland Rural Health, Toowoomba, Australia, and Adjunct Research Fellow, Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia. Ms. O'Connell: Clinical Educator, Speech Pathology, The University of Queensland, Southern Queensland Rural Health, Toowoomba, Australia.
The Journal of continuing education in the health professions
|September 23, 2024
概括
在线名义小组技术 (ONGT) 有效地从分散的卫生专业人员中收集关于研究教育主题的共识. 这种方法是可行的和有用的,即使在不同的互联网连接,提供一个具有成本效益的替代方案.
科学领域:
- 医疗专业教育卫生专业教育
- 研究方法研究方法论.
- 在线协作工具 在线协作工具.
背景情况:
- 名义集团技术 (NGT) 是一种结构化的方法,用于收集集团意见和建立共识.
- 之前的在线NGT (ONGT) 研究专注于互联网接入率较高的地区.
- 这项研究探讨了在分散的农村卫生工作人员中ONGT的可行性.
研究的目的:
- 评估ONGTs在继续研究教育课程开发中的可行性和实用性.
- 确定NGT是否能够有效地收集地理上分散的卫生专业人员的意见并达成共识.
- 在具有多种互联网连接的环境中评估ONGTs.
主要方法:
- 15名临床教育学者参加了为期1小时的ONGT会议.
- 使用Zoom进行视频会议,使用Wooclap进行响应整理和投票.
- 适应传统的NGT在两个农村大学部门和家庭办公室进行在线交付.
主要成果:
- 在线平台促进了积极参与和思想贡献,不管互联网质量如何.
- 沉默的想法产生允许公开讨论和澄清.
- 伍克拉普有效地管理了投票,提供了实时反,并支持对研究培训优先事项的共识.
结论:
- 修改后的ONGT是有效的意见收集和共识在分散的卫生工作人员与多样化的连接.
- 这种方法为传统的面对面NGT提供了一种成本效益和时间效率高的替代方案.
- 非政府组织能够抵御劳动力中断,这使得它们成为远程协作的一个有价值的工具.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
01:34Groupthink
44.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.3K
01:01Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
00:52Social Proof
27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
01:37Social Loafing
34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K
02:13The Representativeness Heuristic
15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
01:31In- and Out-Groups
38.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.9K