工具,威胁,导师,谈话和趋势:大学生对聊天GPT的态度
Sen-Chi Yu1, Yueh-Min Huang2, Ting-Ting Wu3
1Department of Counseling and Applied Psychology, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung 403, Taiwan.
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 28, 2024
概括
大学生将ChatGPT视为一种工具,导师和趋势,同时也是一种威胁. 在大多数维度中,男性对ChatGPT的态度比女性更为积极.
科学领域:
- 人工智能的人工智能
- 人与计算机的交互
- 教育技术的教育技术
背景情况:
- 像ChatGPT这样的人工智能聊天机器人的快速发展需要了解用户的感知.
- 调查学生的态度对于有效地将人工智能工具整合到高等教育中至关重要.
- 之前关于人工智能和性别差异的研究已经产生了各种各样的结果.
研究的目的:
- 为了检查大学生对ChatGPT的态度.
- 确定性别是否影响这些态度.
- 开发和验证可靠的尺度来衡量ChatGPT的态度.
主要方法:
- 聊天GPT态度尺度 (CAS) 的开发.
- 对台湾的516名大学生进行CAS的管理.
- 探索和确认因素分析以验证5T模型 (工具,导师,谈话,趋势,威胁).
主要成果:
- CAS证明了良好的可靠性和有效性,支持5T模型.
- 学生认为ChatGPT是一个有价值的工具,导师,聊天功能和趋势.
- 关于ChatGPT潜在的错误信息和职位流失威胁的重大担忧被确定.
- 与女性相比,男性在工具,导师和趋势子表中报告了更高的整体态度和得分.
结论:
- 经过验证的CAS有效地衡量了大学生对ChatGPT的态度.
- 聊天GPT被视为多方面的,提供实用性,学习支持,社交互动,并代表当前的趋势.
- 性别在对ChatGPT的态度中起着作用,男性在特定领域表现出更有利的观点.
- 这些发现强调了对性别特异性AI相互作用和影响进行进一步研究的必要性.
更多相关视频
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.0K
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
3.9K
相关概念视频
02:16Surveys
14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
01:29Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
01:37Social Loafing
34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K
02:01Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
01:20Conformity
45.0K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.0K
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.1K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.1K