Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

95
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
95
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

38.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

A physics-informed neural network framework for plant-wide prediction and dynamic control of wastewater treatment.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same author

Multimodal deep learning-based prediction of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury via anatomical imaging and spatial dose: A multicenter study.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Deep learning for detection and automatic visualization of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury in nasopharyngeal carcinoma across endemic and non-endemic areas in China.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Research progress on the application of manganese oxides in constructed wetlands: Efficiency, mechanisms, and prospects.

Bioresource technology·2026
Same author

Treatment performance and mechanism of source-separated blackwater using an earthworm-based reactor for rural applications.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same author

Towards integrated pollution control in inland watersheds: addressing multiple challenges through watershed-scale technological systems and targeted control strategies.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2026
Same journal

An Eye-Tracking Study on Text Accessibility and Comprehension in University Students.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Relationship Between Physical Activity, Social Support, and Life Satisfaction Among Female College Students: A Variable- and Person-Centered Analysis.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Shifting the Blame: How Narrative Framing, Coercive Strategies, and Rape Myth Acceptance Distort Perceptions of Sexual Assault and Fuel Victim Blame.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

An AI Perspective on Counseling Supervision.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Symbolic Participation or Substantial Learning Behavior? A PSM-Based Comparison Between Honors and Non-Honors Undergraduates from Two Top Elite Universities in China.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Literacy Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Preadolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

646

集团的时间间决策过程

Hong-Yue Sun1, Yi-Ting Xiao1, Shan-Shan Yang1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 28, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

本研究引入了两种过程方法来理解群体的时间间决策,重点关注互动和信息处理,以便在未来做出更好的选择.

关键词:
决策过程中的决策过程.团队的时间间决策.信息处理是信息的处理.人际互动的人际交互互动.

更多相关视频

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

646
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.9K

科学领域:

  • 决策科学 决策科学
  • 社会心理学 社会心理学
  • 认知科学 认知科学

背景情况:

  • 在个人层面上广泛研究了跨时代决策.
  • 在跨时间背景下进行集体决策的研究不足,但具有显著的实际价值.
  • 现有的研究往往忽视了延迟满足场景中群体动态的复杂性.

研究的目的:

  • 提出和验证一个"双流程"框架来分析群体的时间间决策.
  • 调查潜在的心理和理论机制,包括延迟结果的小组选择.
  • 区分群体与个人决策过程在跨时间的背景下.

主要方法:

  • 使用自我评估问卷来衡量个人的看法和贡献.
  • 使用视听录音来捕捉实时的群体内部的人际交互.
  • 实施视觉决策工具来量化信息处理和选择策略.
  • 分析人际关系动态和认知信息处理.

主要成果:

  • "双过程"方法有效量化了群体环境中的人际交互和信息处理.
  • 确定了区分群体与个人跨时间决策的不同机制.
  • 揭示了控制群体间时间选择中的信息处理的关键机制.

结论:

  • 拟议的框架提供了一种研究小组跨时决策的新方法.
  • 调查结果提供了对随着时间的推移,集体选择的心理基础的见解.
  • 结果可以为干预和推动提供信息,以促进更有前性的小组决策.