风险评估工具的不平等影响:系统审查
Spencer G Lawson1, Emma L Narkewicz1, Gina M Vincent1
1Department of Psychiatry, Implementation Science and Practice Advances Research Center, Law and Psychiatry Program, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School.
Law and human behavior
|September 30, 2024
概括
法律决策中的风险评估工具几乎没有证据表明种族差距正在增加. 研究表明,它们甚至可能减少差距,尽管需要更多高质量的研究.
科学领域:
- 法律研究 法律研究
- 犯罪学 犯罪学
- 公共政策 公共政策
背景情况:
- 人们对法律环境中风险评估工具对种族/种族差异的影响存在担忧.
- 当某些种族或种族群体因偏见的风险估计而面临更严厉的法律结果时,会产生不平等的影响.
研究的目的:
- 系统地审查和综合现有关于青少年和成人风险评估工具对法律决策中的种族/民族差异现实影响的研究.
- 评估风险评估工具是否会造成或加剧法律制度中现有的差异.
主要方法:
- 进行了系统的文献搜索,截至2023年7月.
- 该审查包括21篇文章,调查了13种风险评估工具对法律结果的不同影响,主要是保险学审前选工具.
主要成果:
- 大多数审查的文章 (共21篇中的10篇) 没有发现风险工具创造或加剧差距的证据.
- 八篇文章表明,使用风险工具实际上减少了法律决策方面的差异.
- 只有三篇文章报告了不同影响的证据,只有一个研究表明了强大的质量.
结论:
- 目前的证据表明,风险评估工具可能有助于减少法律差异.
- 然而,现有研究的整体质量很低,使用稳固设计的高质量研究很少.
- 需要进一步进行严格的研究,以检查各种法律决策点和风险评估方法的不同影响.
相关概念视频
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
123
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
123
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83
Hazard Ratio
91
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
For example, in a clinical trial...
91
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Hazard Rate
92
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
92
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
167
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
167


