Search research articles

关于 JoVE

概览领导团队博客 JoVE 帮助中心

作者

出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿

图书馆员

用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题

研究

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments 存档

教育

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual 教师资源中心教师网站

使用条款与条件

相关概念视频

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序

Same author

Psychometric framework for coexistence with large carnivores.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026

Same author

Understanding mitigation intentions for aquatic invasive species: A protection motivation theory perspective.

Ambio·2026

Same author

Political ideology as a predictor of conservation attitudes: Mechanisms and implications.

Ambio·2026

Same author

A new geodatabase of fuel treatments across federal lands in the USA.

Scientific data·2025

Same author

Application of the integrated threat theory to conservation law enforcement.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2024

Same author

The influence of superstitions and emotions on villagers' attitudes towards striped hyena in southwestern Iran.

PloS one·2023

Search research articles

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration

Published on: June 7, 2024

开发可靠和有效的措施来评估协作治理和适应能力:来自协作森林景观恢复计划的一个例子.

Tyler A Beeton¹, Tara L Teel², Melanie M Colavito³

¹Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, 1001 Amy Van Dyken Way, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Journal of environmental management

|October 2, 2024

概括

本研究引入了一项经过验证的调查,用于测量六个关键维度的协作环境治理和适应能力. 这些发现支持其用于评估合作项目和理解可持续性努力.

关键词:

适应能力适应能力适应能力适应能力合作性森林景观恢复计划森林景观恢复计划协作式治理协作式治理协作式治理协作式治理

更多相关视频

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2025

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration

Published on: June 7, 2024

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

科学领域:

环境科学环境科学
社会科学社会科学社会科学
公共政策公共政策

背景情况:

协作和适应性的环境治理对于复杂的社会生态问题和可持续的资源管理至关重要.
现有的研究往往依赖于有限的案例研究,导致各种定义,并阻碍跨上下文推断.
需要对协作治理和适应能力进行系统的,统计学上可靠的评估.

研究的目的:

开发和验证一种标准化的调查工具,用于评估协作治理和适应能力.
测试维度结构,可靠性和协作动态测量的有效性.
为环境治理中的跨案例评估提供一个强大的框架.

主要方法:

开发并管理15个由合作森林景观恢复计划 (CFLRP) 资助的项目进行标准化调查.
采用确认因素分析来测试调查措施的维度结构,可靠性和有效性.
根据合作治理和适应能力的既定理论和实践进行评估.

主要成果:

确定了协作治理和适应能力的六个关键方面:以原则为基础的参与,共享的动机,领导力,资源,知识和学习以及机构安排.
确认这些维度是统计学上可靠,有效和独特的措施.
发现了几个维度之间的显著关系,与理论假设保持一致.

结论:

开发的调查为评估协作治理和适应能力提供了可靠和有效的工具.
六个维度为未来的研究提供了一个框架,包括将协作过程与社会生态结果和弹性联系起来.
评估方法可以适应各种协作环境治理环境,以提高可持续发展目标.