没有论证的合法化:在评估中对"有效性作为论证"的经验性话语分析
Benjamin Kinnear1, Daniel J Schumacher2, Lara Varpio3,4
1Department of Pediatrics at University of Cincinnati College of Medicine in Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Perspectives on medical education
|October 7, 2024
概括
卫生专业教育 (HPE) 评估有效性论述缺乏强有力的论证. 这项研究揭示了论证组件的最小探索,尽管概念的概念.
科学领域:
- 健康 专业 教育 卫生 专业 教育
- 评估的有效性 评估的有效性
- 论证理论 论证理论
背景情况:
- 卫生专业教育 (HPE) 评估中的有效性通常被作为支持数据解释和使用的论据.
- 以前的学术研究表明,HPE内部的论证和论证的应用存在缺陷.
- 本研究探讨了HPE出版文献中围绕评估有效性和论证的论述.
研究的目的:
- 探索HPE内部关于评估有效性的论证和辩论的论述.
- 了解HPE手稿如何影响有效性论证和论证的概念化.
主要方法:
- 采用了一系列批判性话语分析方法.
- 分析了39个有影响力的同行评审HPE手稿的集体.
- 利用论证理论的分析框架进行编码和主题开发.
主要成果:
- 在HPE有效性话语中,论证和论证的阐述特别稀缺.
- 论证理论的关键组成部分,如预期受众,在很大程度上缺席.
- "作为一个论点的有效性"的话语是通过权威,机构行动和叙事来合法化,尽管审查有限.
结论:
- 证实了关于HPE有效性论述中论证和论证的稀缺性的现有发现.
- 突出了将论证理论纳入HPE的机会,以加强验证实践.
- 建议制定验证实践,积极支持HPE评估中使用论证.
相关概念视频
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
38.9K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.9K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
Data Validation
5.0K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.0K
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation
5.1K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
5.1K


