低风险的科学家聚光灯任务证明了高价值和多重影响为入门生物学学生
Angelita T Rivera1, Shaelin Chong1, Jerick Kim1
1Department of Neurobiology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92023.
CBE life sciences education
|October 7, 2024
概括
科学家聚光灯生物课程的作业向学生展示了科学和人性化的科学家的多样性,即使感知到的有用性很低. 这些聚光灯提供了宝贵的见解,并鼓励学生在STEM职业中看到自己.
科学领域:
- 在STEM教育方面.
- 生物教育教育 生物学教育
- 科学社会学科学社会学
背景情况:
- 科学家聚光灯任务突出反思刻板印象的科学家.
- 以前的研究重点是促进STEM中的可能自我.
- 这项研究探讨了学生对这些作业的感知价值和影响.
研究的目的:
- 了解学生对科学家聚光灯的价值.
- 分析这些作业对学生的自我报告影响.
- 探索与多样性,人性化和自我效能相关的新兴主题.
主要方法:
- 一个入门生物学课程的学生反思了长期的课程影响.
- 预期价值理论指导了分析.
- 对于提到科学家聚焦点的反思,使用了主题分析.
主要成果:
- 49%的学生提到了科学家聚焦点,尽管仪器价值低.
- 新兴的主题包括科学多样性,科学家人性化和自我效能.
- 在少数群体和非少数群体学生之间观察到的差异很少.
结论:
- 科学家聚光灯作为"窗户"进入科学多样性",镜子"人性化科学家,和"滑动玻璃门"参与.
- 这些作业对学生有广泛,多重和交叉的影响.
- 这项研究扩大了对 STEM 包容性教学工具影响的理解.
相关概念视频
Case Studies
11.6K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K
Social Loafing
34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K
Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K


