采访和审讯方法及其对真实和虚假供认的影响:系统性审查更新和扩展
Mary Catlin1, David Wilson1, Allison D Redlich1
1Criminology, Law and Society George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA.
Campbell systematic reviews
|October 11, 2024
概括
控诉式审讯方法增加了虚假的供认,而信息收集技术则产生了更多真实的供认. 研究结果支持改革审讯政策,以支持基于科学的方法.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 犯罪学 犯罪学
- 法律研究 法律研究
背景情况:
- 虚假的自白是司法系统的一个重大问题.
- 审讯方法直接影响真实和虚假的供认率.
研究的目的:
- 系统地审查和更新有关不同审讯方法对供认率的影响的研究.
- 评估指控,信息收集和直接询问方法对假嫌疑人的真实和虚假自白的影响.
主要方法:
- 在多个数据库 (PsycINFO,刑事司法摘要等) 进行了系统的文献搜索. ) 的情况.
- 包括对审讯方法和已知的基本真相进行实验操纵的研究.
- 利用网络元分析来综合29项涉及81个效果大小的研究的数据.
主要成果:
- 与直接询问和信息收集相比,指控方法显著增加了虚假供认.
- 收集信息的方法比直接询问产生了更多的真实自白.
- 控诉式方法导致真实供认较少,尽管并不总是统计学上显著.
结论:
- 目前的调查结果强烈支持政策改革,禁止指控性审讯策略.
- 建议采用以科学为基础,收集信息的审讯方法,以改善司法结果.
相关概念视频
False Memories
75
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
75
Eyewitness Memory
94
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
94
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.0K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.0K
Ethics in Research
22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K


