意外怀孕的空间异质性及其在印度的决定因素
Anshika Singh1, Mahashweta Chakrabarty2, Aditya Singh3
1Department of Geography, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
|October 14, 2024
概括
印度的意外怀孕显示出显著的地理差异,北部和喜马拉雅州的比率更高. 有针对性的干预措施对于改善生殖健康结果至关重要.
科学领域:
- 生殖健康 生殖健康
- 空间流行病学 空间流行病学
- 公共卫生政策 公共卫生政策
背景情况:
- 了解意外怀孕的地理差异对于有针对性的公共卫生政策至关重要.
- 印度缺乏对意外怀孕的空间分析,因此需要进行这项研究.
研究的目的:
- 调查印度的地理分布和意外怀孕的决定因素.
- 识别意外怀孕的高风险地区,为政策干预提供信息.
主要方法:
- 分析国家家庭健康调查-5数据 (2014-2021) 来自232,920个怀孕.
- 空间分析包括 choropleth 地图,全球莫兰的I,以及集群/异常值分析.
- 应用空间滞后模型和空间错误模型来识别影响因素.
主要成果:
- 全国意外怀孕率为9.1%,在州和地区层面有很大的差异.
- 在北部和喜马拉雅州发现了高率的集群,包括特定的地区.
- 平价和现代避孕药的使用是意外怀孕的重要预测因素.
结论:
- 在印度,意外怀孕的地理差异很大.
- 在确定的热点地区,有针对性的政策干预对于减少意外怀孕至关重要.
- 解决这些差异可以改善印度的整体生殖健康结果.
关键词:
印度 印度 印度莫兰斯的第一个.在 NFHS 中, NFHS 是指:空间分析是一种空间分析.空间自相关性 空间自相关性空间聚类 空间聚类空间依赖性 空间依赖性意想不到的怀孕是没有计划的.意外怀孕是没有计划的.不想要的怀孕 不想要的怀孕更多相关视频
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
2.2K
06:49Methods for Studying Uterine Contributions to Pregnancy Establishment in an Ovariectomized Mouse Model
Published on: April 7, 2023
1.6K
相关概念视频
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
163
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
163
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
146
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
146
Spermatogenesis
102.2K
Spermatogenesis is the process by which haploid sperm cells are produced in the male testes. It starts with stem cells located close to the outer rim of seminiferous tubules. These spermatogonial stem cells divide asymmetrically to give rise to additional stem cells (meaning that these structures “self-renew”), as well as sperm progenitors, called spermatocytes. Importantly, this method of asymmetric mitotic division maintains a population of spermatogonial stem cells in the male...
102.2K
Prevalence and Incidence
378
In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
378
Cross-Sectional Research
11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
