Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

209
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
209
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

94
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
94
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

178
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
178
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.3K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.3K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.2K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Preliminary examination of symptom validity in veterans using the Rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2026
Same author

Comparing perceptions of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) across health care disciplines.

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Within-Person Score Distribution Measures as Performance Validity Indicators in Service Members and Veterans with and without History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2025
Same author

Derivation of embedded symptom validity indicators for the Brief Symptom Inventory-18.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2025
Same author

Reconsidering cognitive outcome one year after mild traumatic brain injury: Secondary analysis of TRACK-TBI data.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2025
Same author

Collinearity, tetrachoric correlation, and criterion group assignment of examinees failing only one performance validity test (PVT): Testing Leonhard's (2023) PVT critique.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

714

确定假阳性率是否随着性能有效性测试电池扩展而增加.

Robert J Kanser1, Martin L Rohling2, Jeremy J Davis3

  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

The Clinical neuropsychologist
|October 17, 2024
PubMed
概括

将性能验证测试 (PVT) 从4扩展到8并没有增加假阳性. 这项研究发现了稳定的失败率,这表明当前的方法是可靠的评估神经心理评估的有效性.

关键词:
业绩表现 业绩表现 业绩表现无效的绩效陷 无效的性能陷这是模仿,模仿.的有效性有效性.

更多相关视频

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

364
Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

4.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

714
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

364
Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

4.4K

科学领域:

  • 神经心理学 神经心理学
  • 法医心理学 法医心理学
  • 临床心理学 临床心理学

背景情况:

  • 性能有效性测试 (PVT) 对于检测无效的神经心理评估至关重要.
  • 在临床和法医环境中,PVTs的错误分类是一个重大问题.
  • 增加PVT数量对错误分类率的影响需要调查.

研究的目的:

  • 为了确定PVT分析从4个测试扩展到8个测试是否会提高错误的阳性性能有效性错误分类.
  • 将观察到的故障率与蒙特卡洛模拟预测进行比较.

主要方法:

  • 对443名接受固定神经心理电池治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析.
  • 4-PVT和8-PVT分析之间的故障率的比较.
  • 不确定的表演者 (IDT) 与PVT-Fail组进行比较.

主要成果:

  • 两个PVT的失败率保持稳定 (12.9%至11.9%),同时从4个PVT扩大到8个PVT.
  • 观察到的故障率明显低于蒙特卡洛模拟预测.
  • 与PVT-Fail组相比,IDT组年轻,表现更强,推/诊断率相似.

结论:

  • 蒙特卡洛模拟高估了故障率,因为PVT电池长度翻了一番.
  • IDT 组的特征并不完全支持它们是假阳性.
  • 需要进一步研究PVT电池长度对有效性分类准确性的影响.