Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

43
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
43
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.5K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.5K
Egoism and Altruism01:55

Egoism and Altruism

91.4K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
91.4K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Agreements and disagreements with resource-rational contractualism.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Contractarian partiality, contractualist impartiality, and the question of falsifiability.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Contractualist Moral Cognition: From the Normative to the Descriptive at Three Levels of Analysis.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science·2025
Same author

Environmental variability shapes the representational format of cultural learning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Teachers recruit mentalizing regions to represent learners' beliefs.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Representational exchange in social learning: Blurring the lines between the ritual and instrumental.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2022

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

644

道德判断对讨价还价能力敏感.

Arthur Le Pargneux1, Fiery Cushman2

  • 1Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick.

Journal of experimental psychology. General
|October 17, 2024
PubMed
概括

伦理判断考虑的是讨价还价的力量. 人们给予那些具有更高谈判能力的人更多的自由度,并将更严格的标准适用于那些没有那么多的人,从而影响公平感知.

科学领域:

  • 道德心理学道德心理学
  • 社会认知是指社会认知.
  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.

背景情况:

  • 合同主义道德认为,如果有理性代理商同意,那么行为是道德的.
  • 谈判权,受到风险和替代品的影响,影响谈判结果.
  • 谈判权在道德判断中的作用仍然是合同主义理论的关键测试.

研究的目的:

  • 调查道德判断是否包含一个人的讨价还价能力.
  • 检查感知到的讨价还价能力如何影响社会互动中行动的道德适当性.
  • 测试有关公平性和权力动态的合同主义道德理论的预测.

主要方法:

  • 五个预先注册的实验涉及3025名美国参与者.
  • 描绘日常社会互动的场景与不平等的谈判权.
  • 参与者根据描述的权力动态来评估行动的道德适当性.

主要成果:

  • 当由具有较低谈判权力的当事人执行时,行为被认为在道德上不那么合适.
  • 参与者对具有更高谈判权力的各方给予了更多的道德宽容.
  • 谈判权力对道德判断的影响独立于不对称度的大小.

更多相关视频

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.1K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

23.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

644
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.1K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

23.2K

结论:

  • 道德判断对相对的讨价还价能力敏感,而不仅仅是客观的公平性.
  • 通过突出权力动态的影响,这些发现挑战了纯粹理性主义的合同主义者账户.
  • 这种偏见可能会导致不公平的社会规范和不平等的延续.