相关实验视频
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Thermal Ablation for the Treatment of Abdominal Tumors
Published on: March 7, 2011
微波与射频废除在治疗主要是固体良性甲状腺结节:一个随机对照试验
Sitong Chen1, Jianping Dou1, Yuancheng Cang1
1From the Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 100 W Fourth Ring Rd, Beijing 100039, China (S.C., J.D., Y. Cang, J.Y., P.L.); Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China (S.C., Y. Cang); Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China (Y. Che); Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China (G.D.); Department of Ultrasound, Lishui People's Hospital, Lishui, China (C.Z.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China (D.X.); and Department of Statistics, Guilin Gooclin Technology, Guilin, China (Q.L.).
微波切除 (MWA) 和射频切除 (RFA) 在治疗良性甲状腺结节时同样有效. 虽然MWA显示了可比的疗效,但需要进一步的研究来确认其与RFA相比的安全性.
科学领域:
- 干预性放射学 干预性放射学
- 内分泌学 在内分泌学.
- 在瘤学瘤学.
背景情况:
- 射频切除 (RFA) 是对良性甲状腺结节的建议第一线治疗方法.
- 微波除 (MWA) 是一种新兴的替代疗法.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较MWA与RFA在治疗主要是固体良性甲状腺结节的疗效和安全性.
主要方法:
- 这是一项前性,随机的,开放的,多中心的研究.
- 76名参与者接受了MWA,76人接受了良性甲状腺结节的RFA.
- 随访时间至少为2年,评估体积减少率,并发症和技术有效性.
主要成果:
- 在6个月和2年的体积减少率上,MWA不低于RFA.
- 随着时间的推移,体积减小或技术有效性 (体积减小≥50%) 没有发现显著差异.
- 声音变化是最常见的重大并发症,发生在6.6%的MWA患者和1.3%的RFA患者中 (P=.21).
结论:
- 在治疗主要是固体良性甲状腺结节方面,MWA和RFA的疗效相似.
- 需要进行更大规模的研究,才能确定MWA和RFA之间的可比安全概况.
更多相关视频
04:22Application of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Intraoperative Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
Published on: March 3, 2023
05:56Evaluation of the Feasibility, Safety, and Accuracy of an Intraoperative High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Treating Liver Metastases
Published on: January 9, 2019