相关实验视频
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

05:57
Quantitative 31P NMR Analysis of Lignins and Tannins
Published on: August 2, 2021
12.3K
[使用定量NMR方法对Paralepistopsis acromelalga中克利蒂丁的量化]
Yoshitaka Ishida1, Yuka Nagaoka1
1Yamagata Prefectural Institute of Public Health.
概括
定量NMR提供了一种无标准的方法来分析自然毒素,如来自Paralepistopsis acromelalga.rom的clitidine. 这种快速的技术提供了与LC-MS/MS可比的准确结果,这对于疫情期间的毒素分析至关重要.
科学领域:
- 分析化学 分析化学
- 自然产品化学 自然产品化学
- 毒理学 毒理学 毒理学
背景情况:
- 克利蒂丁是Paralepistopsis acromelalga的有毒成分,缺乏商业可用性和标准,阻碍了准确的量化.
- 像HPLC和LC-MS/MS这样的传统方法依赖于参考标准,这些标准可能很难获得或准确地描述.
研究的目的:
- 研究一种定量核磁共振 (qNMR) 方法,用于分析Paralepistopsis acromelalga毒素,而不需要特定的参考标准.
- 为了比较qNMR的准确性和效率与传统的LC-MS/MS用于毒素量化.
主要方法:
- 量化NMR (qNMR) 用于确定标准的绝对纯度,揭示了由于含水量而导致传统HPLC纯度的显著低估.
- 在Paralepistopsis acromelalga水果提取物中毒素的度使用qNMR和常规LC-MS/MS量化.
主要成果:
- qNMR准确地确定了标准的绝对纯度为89.8±1.5%,突出了HPLC纯度评估的局限性.
- 使用qNMR和LC-MS/MS获得的果实提取物的定量值没有显著差异,通常在5%的误差范围内.
结论:
- 定量NMR是天然毒素分析的有价值,无标准的工具,提供快速测量并消除了对参考材料的需求.
- 该方法特别有利于在突发疫情期间分析毒素,其中速度和准确性至关重要.
相关概念视频
¹³C NMR: Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer (DEPT)
1.0K
When proton-coupled carbon-13 spectra are simplified by a broadband proton decoupling technique, structural information about the coupled protons is lost. Distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT) is a technique that provides information on the number of hydrogens attached to each carbon in a molecule. While the DEPT experiment utilizes complex pulse sequences, the pulse delay and flip angle are specifically manipulated. The resulting signals have different phases depending on...
1.0K
¹H NMR Signal Integration: Overview
1.4K
The intensity of a signal, which can be represented by the area under the peak, depends on the number of protons contributing to that signal. The area under each peak is shown as a vertical line called an integral, with the integral value listed under it, as seen in the proton NMR spectrum of benzyl acetate. Each integral value is divided by the smallest integral value to obtain the ratio of the number of protons producing each signal. The ratio reveals the relative number of protons and not...
1.4K

