Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.1K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.4K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.4K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

128
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
128
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

176
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
176
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

8.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
8.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.8K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.8K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Claims about scientific rigour require rigour.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Subjective evidence evaluation survey for many-analysts studies.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

Rigorous exploration in a model-centric science via epistemic iteration.

Journal of applied research in memory and cognition·2024
Same author

There are no shortcuts to theory.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2024
Same author

The logical structure of experiments lays the foundation for a theory of reproducibility.

Royal Society open science·2023
Same author

The case for formal methodology in scientific reform.

Royal Society open science·2021

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement
08:06

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement

Published on: January 19, 2017

8.4K

统计服务于元科学:用可复制率测量复制距离.

Erkan O Buzbas1, Berna Devezer1,2

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistical Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 25, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

科学复制性至关重要. 这项研究建议测量研究之间的"复制距离",将可重复性视为一种工具,而不是固有的属性,以改善科学推断并指导未来的研究.

关键词:
理想化的实验是理想化的实验.最低可行的实验.统计学的哲学 统计学的哲学复制距离的复制距离可复制率的可复制率科学推论是科学推论.

更多相关视频

The Replica Set Method: A High-throughput Approach to Quantitatively Measure Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan
11:58

The Replica Set Method: A High-throughput Approach to Quantitatively Measure Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan

Published on: June 29, 2018

9.4K
Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

2.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement
08:06

Genome-wide Determination of Mammalian Replication Timing by DNA Content Measurement

Published on: January 19, 2017

8.4K
The Replica Set Method: A High-throughput Approach to Quantitatively Measure Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan
11:58

The Replica Set Method: A High-throughput Approach to Quantitatively Measure Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan

Published on: June 29, 2018

9.4K
Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

2.3K

科学领域:

  • 统计学哲学 统计学的哲学
  • 科学方法科学方法学
  • 研究可复制性研究可复制性

背景情况:

  • 科学界面临着可重现性危机,影响研究结果的可靠性.
  • 目前关于可复制性的讨论往往缺乏评估复制努力的细微框架.
  • 了解研究可复制性和结果可复制性之间的关系对于强大的科学推断至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 提出一种用于测量科学研究之间的"复制距离"的新框架.
  • 将可重现性重新定义,而不是作为一种内在的品质,而是作为评估复制中偏差的指标.
  • 根据科学复制的挑战,提高统计推理的实用性.

主要方法:

  • 用于统计推断的科学研究规范的概念分析.
  • 开发"复制距离"指标,以量化原始研究与其复制之间的差异.
  • 使用玩具示例进行说明性模拟,以展示拟议的框架.

主要成果:

  • 最好将可重现性理解为测量与原始研究的距离的工具,而不是固有的可取性质.
  • 提出了量化"复制距离"的框架,解决了捕获研究组件的挑战.
  • 建议有目的地计划修改,而不是直接复制,因为它对科学研究更有信息.

结论:

  • "复制距离"的可量化的测量是必要的,以便对可复制性对科学推理的影响进行可靠的研究.
  • 拟议的框架有助于科学家确定"可复制"的研究.
  • 基于概率和证据的统计方法被认为是开发更好地为科学实践服务的统计数据的潜在关键.