作者与公民科学:七个启发式规则
Per Sandin1, Patrik Baard2, William Bülow3
1Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7043, 75651, Uppsala, Sweden. per.sandin@slu.se.
Science and engineering ethics
|October 29, 2024
概括
公民科学 (CS) 研究需要明确的作者准则. 本文回顾了现有的规则,并提出了建议,以确保公民科学项目的所有贡献者获得公平的信用.
科学领域:
- 科学研究方法学 科学研究方法学
- 志愿者参与科学活动
背景情况:
- 公民科学涉及大量的志愿者贡献,模糊了研究人员和受试者之间的界限.
- 这种双重角色引发了关于科学出版物的责任,信用和作者身份的复杂问题.
研究的目的:
- 审查现有的作者指南,并评估它们对公民科学的适用性.
- 评估公民科学家在当前指导方针 (如温哥华指导方针) 下作为作者的潜在排斥.
- 倡导公民科学家作为作者,以透明和公平的原则为基础.
主要方法:
- 对当前作者指南的文献综述.
- 分析国际医学期刊编辑委员会 (ICMJE) 准则对公民科学的适用性.
- 发展支持将公民科学家纳入作者的论点.
- 制定关于公民科学中的作者决定的建议.
主要成果:
- 现有的作者准则可能无法充分适应公民科学家的贡献.
- 温哥华的指导方针可能会将值得的公民科学家从作者身份中排除在外.
- 关于将公民科学家作为作者的论点集中在透明度和公平性上.
- 在公民科学中将群体作为作者纳入,被认为是合理的.
结论:
- 公民科学中的著作权标准需要重新评估,以确保公平和透明度.
- 提供了建议,以指导公民科学出版物的作者决定.
- 促进包容性的作者实践可以加强公民科学的完整性和影响力.
相关概念视频
The Scientific Method
224.6K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
224.6K
Biodiversity and Human Values
13.0K
Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.
13.0K
Altruism
40.9K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
40.9K
Inductive Reasoning
60.1K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.1K
Ethics in Research
22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Heuristics
78
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
78


