在ADHD评估中确定增加嵌入性能有效性测试假阳性率的因素.
John-Christopher A Finley1, Logan M Tufty2,3, Steven A Abalos3
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
概括
嵌入式性能有效性指标 (EVI) 在注意力缺陷/多动症 (ADHD) 评估中可能具有高的错误阳性率 (FPR). 聚合EVI和避免那些没有人口调整的人群,特别是种族,可以减少ADHD评估的不准确性.
科学领域:
- 神经心理学 神经心理学
- 临床心理学 临床心理学
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
背景情况:
- 嵌入式性能有效性指标 (EVI) 对于准确的注意力缺陷/多动症 (ADHD) 评估至关重要.
- 某些EVI在ADHD评估中表现出更高的假阳性率 (FPR),可能导致误诊.
- 了解导致高FPR的因素对于完善评估协议至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查FPR和15个EVI之间的关系,来自ADHD成年人的六个认知测试.
- 确定特定的EVI,这些EVI在这个人群中导致FPR升高.
- 为了确定汇总EVI对整体FPR的影响.
主要方法:
- 分析了来自517名成年ADHD转诊患者的数据,其中包括有效的神经认知测试表现.
- 基于具有≥0.90特异性的确定的EVI截止值计算FPRs.
- 对单个和聚合EVI的FPR进行比较,考虑各种测试特征.
主要成果:
- 两个认知测试独立地产生了> 10% 的 FPR 的 EVI;聚合将总的 FPR 降低到 8.1%.
- 持续注意力测试EVI显示FPR约为11%.
- 缺乏人口调整 (例如,种族) 的EVI具有更高的FPR (~14%).
结论:
- 实践者应该仔细选择EVI,考虑源测试和使用的指标数量.
- 聚合EVI可以帮助尽量减少ADHD评估中的FPR.
- 开发更细微的有效性测试方法是改善ADHD评估的必要条件.
更多相关视频
13:09Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
10.3K
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
5.7K
相关概念视频
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
45
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. It affects approximately 5-8% of children globally, with around 60-70% of cases persisting into adulthood. ADHD has significant implications for educational attainment, social interactions, and occupational success.
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
45
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
