使用世俗语言证明有争议的社会和政治要求:对加拿大右翼极端主义的分析
1University of Toronto, Canada.
概括
加拿大右翼极端组织通过在线讨论非政治话题来掩盖极端观点. 这项研究分析了他们的社交媒体话语,以了解他们如何向更广泛的受众证明有争议的说法.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
背景情况:
- 关于极右翼极端主义团体如何在网上证明其主张的研究有限.
- 加拿大背景是独一无二的,因为多元文化主义政策和不容忍仇恨言论.
研究的目的:
- 分析加拿大极右翼极端主义团体在线话语.
- 了解这些团体如何向广大受众证明极端主张的合理性.
- 应用Boltanski和Thévenot的批判能力社会学共同的世界框架.
主要方法:
- 对300条Facebook和Twitter帖子进行了内容分析.
- 专注于加拿大的三个右翼极端组织:加拿大身份证,英属哥伦比亚省奥丁士兵和加拿大黄背心.
主要成果:
- 极右翼极端主义团体主张加拿大同质化身份和价值观.
- 他们宣扬社会衰落的信念,支持专制主义.
- 有争议的观点被掩盖在非政治话题的讨论中.
结论:
- 批判能力的社会学共同的世界框架可以解释极端主张的正当性.
- 非政治话题在战略上被用来掩盖在线极端主义意识形态.
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.0K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.0K
In- and Out-Groups
38.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.9K
Deindividuation
26.3K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.3K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K


