基于案例的学习:对学生团体工作的分析和促进协作讨论的教学设计
Hayley N Nielsen1, Sanlyn R Buxner2, Holly S Bender3
1University of Arizona College of Veterinary Medicine, 1580 E Hanley Blvd, Oro Valley, AZ, 85737 and current PhD student, University of Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109.
Journal of veterinary medical education
|November 5, 2024
概括
兽医的学生 兽医的学生
科学领域:
- 兽医教育 兽医教育
- 协作式学习是一种协作式学习.
- 教学研究教学研究
背景情况:
- 小组协作基于案例的学习 (CBL) 在兽医教育中越来越多地使用.
- 有效的实施需要有成效的学生讨论,以加深学习成果.
- 了解学生的互动是优化CBL有效性的关键.
研究的目的:
- 分析专业兽医学生在协作临床案例工作中的互动.
- 将临床案例问题设计与集团内部协作结果联系起来.
- 通过教学设计,向兽医教育工作者提供有关加强学生讨论的信息.
主要方法:
- 分析了来自14名兽医学生的98次合作事件,分为两组.
- 专注于团队学习 (TBL) 密集课程活动中的互动.
- 在五个会议中检查了49个案例问题.
主要成果:
- 在学生群体中确定了八种主要陈述类型和七种协作模式.
- 揭示了学生如何谈判观点,以便在案例任务上达成共识.
- 突出了影响合作的教学设计元素:多个视角,分歧,感知难度,学习成果水平和必要的共识.
结论:
- 学生在兽医CBL中的合作受到特定的教学设计选择的影响.
- 提供了设计案例问题的建议,以促进学生的强有力的讨论.
- 优化问题结构可以导致兽医教育中更有效的协作学习.
更多相关视频
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
3.9K
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
3.7K
相关概念视频
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
2.0K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.0K
Social Loafing
34.6K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.6K
Groupthink
44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
Critical Thinking II
2.8K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.8K
Cognitive Learning
222
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
222
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
