诱人还是令人担忧? 禁止知识在政治话语中的两极化效应
V A Parker1, E Kehoe2, J Lees3
1Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Personality & social psychology bulletin
|November 6, 2024
概括
政治两极分化影响了人们对受审查信息的看法. 保守派更容易被压制的COVID-19声称所吸引,而自由派则对信息被视为禁知识时表现出较少的兴趣.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
- 沟通研究 沟通研究
背景情况:
- "禁止知识"的说法,暗示信息被审查或压制,是阴谋论的核心.
- 这种说法可能被认为是诱人的或令人担忧的,受个人政治世界观的影响.
- 很少有系统的研究探讨了被禁止的知识声称的心理影响.
研究的目的:
- 调查如何将有争议的信息,特别是与COVID-19相关的信息,作为"禁止知识"影响政治保守派和自由派.
- 检查整个政治领域对信息抑制动机的不同解释.
- 评估禁止知识框架对批判性思维和信念形成的影响.
主要方法:
- 进行了三项研究 (N = 2363),其中两项是预先注册的.
- 参与者接触到被审查或不被审查的COVID-19索赔.
- 方法包括测量吸引力,信仰,解释抑制动机,以及风险推理任务中的批判性思维错误.
主要成果:
- 保守派对被审查的COVID-19声明表现出更大的吸引力和信心,无论审查框架如何.
- 当信息被视为被审查时,自由主义者表现出兴趣和信念的减少.
- 自由主义者将压制解释为表明有害或虚假的信息,而保守派则将其视为有价值和真实的信息.
- 保守派在疫苗风险评估中表现出更多的批判性思维错误,当信息被视为被审查时.
结论:
- 将信息视为"禁知识"具有两极分化作用,加剧了政治分歧.
- 政治世界观显著地调节了被压制的信息的接收和解释.
- 该研究强调了审查观念如何影响信仰,推理和批判性评估,特别是在党派背景下.
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
Groupthink
44.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.2K
Potential Due to a Polarized Object
367
A neutral atom consists of a positively charged nucleus surrounded by a negatively charged electron cloud. When placed in an external electric field, the external electric force pulls the electrons and nucleus apart, opposite to the intrinsic attraction between the nucleus and the electrons. The opposing forces balance each other with a slight shift between the center of masses of the nucleus and the electron cloud, resulting in a polarized atom. On the other hand, a few molecules, like water,...
367
Framing Effects
7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.5K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.5K
Cognitive Dissonance
32.5K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.5K


