相关实验视频
Updated: Jun 8, 2025
06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.3K
基于社会燃烧理论的网络论传播的建模,在突然的社会热点事件下进行
Tinggui Chen1,2, Tiantian Wu1, Jianjun Yang3
1School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
PloS one
|November 6, 2024
概括
这项研究引入了一种新的模型来了解在线论的传播,强调个人特征和外部因素如何影响其速度和规模. 政府的信誉和信息透明度是管理公共话语的关键.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
- 网络科学 网络科学
背景情况:
- 在互联网时代的社会事件中,信息的快速传播需要了解论动态.
- 群体行为可以很容易被突然的在线事件触发,强调研究论传播的必要性.
- 现有的模型可能无法完全捕捉在线话语中个体特征和外部环境因素之间的相互作用.
研究的目的:
- 建立一个基于社会燃烧理论的论传播的新型模型.
- 调查个人特征 (例如,自我意识) 和外部因素 (例如,周围影响) 对在线公众论的影响.
- 分析影响论传播的速度,消散和规模的因素.
主要方法:
- 开发离散燃烧不燃烧稳定 (DBUS) 模型,从自然燃烧中提取类比.
- 整合个人属性,如自我意识和合规性.
- 包括外部环境因素,如网络结构和周围的个人影响.
- 模拟实验用于测试模型的预测.
主要成果:
- 公众论的传播速度和消散受到认知能力,符合性和网络结构的影响.
- 政府的可信度,媒体的可信度和信息透明度是公众论规模的关键决定因素.
- 该DBUS模型为分析在线论现象提供了经过验证的框架.
结论:
- DBUS模型提供了一种全面的方法来了解在线公众论,整合个人和环境因素.
- 有效管理论取决于诸如认知能力,社会一致性,网络动态和机构信誉等因素.
- 该研究强调了透明度和信任的重要性,以减轻快速传播信息的负面影响.
更多相关视频
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
5.1K
09:50Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
Published on: February 12, 2015
11.1K
相关概念视频
01:01Group Polarization
34.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.2K
00:52Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
02:06Social Exchange Theory
34.4K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.4K
01:20Conformity
45.0K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.0K
02:12Relationship Formation
39.8K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
39.8K
01:04Social Facilitation
31.8K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.8K