Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

176
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
176
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.2K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.5K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.5K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.5K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.1K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.1K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Variable selection for clinical prediction models in low-dimensional data - a simulation study comparing traditional regression and machine learning methods.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Primary versus secondary microvascular bony jaw reconstruction in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and adjuvant therapy - a retrospective cohort study.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
Same author

Estimation, testing and sample size calculation within the responder-stratified exponential survival model.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Parental mental illness and child brain structure: A diffusion MRI study of emotion regulation related pathways.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Multimodal assessment of emotion regulation in children of parents with a mental illness.

European child & adolescent psychiatry·2026
Same author

Association of hemodynamic variability during endovascular stroke treatment with functional outcome and parenchymal hemorrhage.

Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

对适应式双阶段设计的最佳条件误差函数的新结果.

Maximilian Pilz1,2, Meinhard Kieser1

  • 1Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Journal of applied statistics
|November 7, 2024
PubMed
概括

本研究探讨了适应性临床试验的最佳条件错误函数. 它展示了变量微积分如何导出这些函数,并优化它们用于有前途的区域设计,提高试验效率.

科学领域:

  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 临床试验设计 临床试验设计
  • 统计方法 统计方法

背景情况:

  • 在适应性临床试验中,非盲目的中间分析越来越常见.
  • 在这些试验中,控制I型错误率至关重要,通常使用条件错误函数实现.
  • 选择一个最佳的条件错误函数仍然是一个开放的问题.

研究的目的:

  • 扩展对最佳条件错误函数的现有工作.
  • 为了证明微积分在推导最佳条件误差函数时的应用.
  • 为有希望的区域设计优化条件错误函数,并评估效率增长.

主要方法:

  • 应用变量微积分技术.
  • 导出现有的最佳条件误差函数.
  • 优化条件错误函数用于有前途的区域设计.

主要成果:

  • 变量微积分可以有效地用于导出最佳的条件误差函数.
  • 确定了有前途的区域设计的最佳条件错误函数.
  • 调查与优化功能相关的效率提升.

结论:

关键词:
适应性设计适应性设计临床试验临床试验临床试验临床试验临床试验有条件错误函数的条件错误函数最优的设计最优的设计变量微积分是变量的微积分.

更多相关视频

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.5K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.5K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.7K
  • 该研究提供了一个数学框架来导出和优化条件错误函数.
  • 这些发现有助于更高效和更强大的自适应性临床试验设计.
  • 优化的条件错误函数提高了对临床研究I型错误率的控制.