超越二进制:分析封闭源数据,比较暴力和非暴力恐怖主义参与中的特定角色和行为.
Amber Seaward1, Zoe Marchment1, Caitlin Clemmow1
1Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK.
Journal of forensic sciences
|November 7, 2024
概括
除暴力之外的恐怖行为与非暴力的分类揭示了更详细的风险因素. 这种细微的方法对于准确评估打击暴力极端主义的威胁至关重要.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 犯罪学 犯罪学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 研究越来越多地比较暴力和非暴力恐怖主义行为的风险因素.
- 二元区分可能不足以理解细微的角色和行为.
研究的目的:
- 调查是否将恐怖行为分解为更细致的角色是有价值的.
- 为了比较暴力和非暴力推和英国预防中心内的特定行为.
主要方法:
- 分析了404个转介给英国打击暴力极端主义中心的情况.
- 两变量和多变量分析比较推类别和特定行为 (脆弱性,外国战斗,暴力计划).
主要成果:
- 除了暴力/非暴力之外的行为分类揭示了更详细的关系.
- 性别并没有区分暴力/非暴力转介,但女性更倾向于因脆弱性或外国战斗而转介.
- 人格和发育障碍与暴力有关;分类数据提供了对这些关联的洞察力.
结论:
- 除了简单的暴力/非暴力二进制之外,对恐怖主义行为的分类有很大的价值.
- 威胁评估的操作影响包括使用精细的风险因素来获得更相关的结果.
- 进一步的研究和实践应该采用更细致的方法来理解恐怖分子的角色和行为.
更多相关视频
09:49Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
14.1K
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
相关概念视频
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
Surveys
14.7K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.7K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.0K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.0K
Deindividuation
26.3K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.3K
