Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

194
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
194
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

176
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
176

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

IconicITA: Iconicity ratings of the Italian affective lexicon.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Specificity effect in concrete/abstract semantic categorization task.

Cognitive processing·2025
Same author

Understanding generative AI to harness its potentials and mini- mize risks: A perspective.

European journal of radiology·2025
Same author

CONcreTEXT norms: Concreteness ratings for Italian and English words in context.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Linguistic profile automated characterisation in pluripotential clinical high-risk mental state (CHARMS) conditions: methodology of a multicentre observational study.

BMJ open·2023
Same author

Specificity ratings for Italian data.

Behavior research methods·2022
Same journal

More caution or more lenient: deciphering the role of negative affect in recognition and inference.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Cognitive offloading, critical thinking and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in the era of ChatGPT: a comparative study of artificial intelligence-assisted and manual task performance in young adults.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Emojis vs. black-and-white and colored drawings: comparing living and non-living things in oral naming.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

The impact of facial expressions on space- and object-based attention by gaze cues.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Feature interaction in metaphor aptness: the impact of topic-and-vehicle applicable features and semantic distances.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Partner forgetfulness weakens responsible forgetting.

Cognitive processing·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

707

英语数据的特异性评级.

Andrea Amelio Ravelli1, Marianna Marcella Bolognesi1, Tommaso Caselli2

  • 1ABSTRACTION Research Group, Department of Modern Languages, Literatures and Cultures, University of Bologna, Via Cartoleria 5, 40124, Bologna, BO, Italy.

Cognitive processing
|November 8, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这项研究引入了一个新的词语特异性评级数据集. 具体性与具体性一起,在认知任务中显著影响文字处理和决策.

关键词:
抽象是一种抽象.最好的/最糟糕的缩放分类 分类 分类 分类 分类.具体性的具体性跨语言的比较.人类评级 人类评级具体性 具体性 具体性

更多相关视频

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

403
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

707
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

403
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 心理语言学 心理语言学
  • 词汇语义上的语义学 词汇语义上的语义学

背景情况:

  • 现有的研究经常检查单词的属性,如具体性.
  • 单词在认知任务中的特异性的作用需要进一步研究.
  • 评级数据的跨语言可比性对于更广泛的理解至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 呈现和分析一个新的数据集,对英语单词的特异性评级.
  • 调查特异性和具体性对词汇和语义任务中的决策延迟的贡献.
  • 通过与已建立的数据集对齐,促进跨语言的比较.

主要方法:

  • 采集了使用最佳-最差缩放方法的特异性评级.
  • 来自英语单词情感规范 (ANEW) 数据集的使用单词.
  • 分析了个人对决策延迟贡献的数据.

主要成果:

  • 具体性评级显示出对决策延迟的显著解释能力.
  • 具体性和具体性表明对任务执行的独立贡献.
  • 该数据集与现有资源和意大利特异性数据相兼容.

结论:

  • 词的特异性是认知文字处理的一个关键因素.
  • 未来关于具体效应的研究应该包含具体性.
  • 这一数据集使得对单词属性的强有力的跨语言调查成为可能.