使用惯性运动捕捉手动材料处理过程中关节动力学的估计:一个后续研究
Sebastian Skals1, Mark de Zee2, Michael Skipper Andersen3
1The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, Copenhagen East 2100, Denmark.
Journal of biomechanical engineering
|November 9, 2024
概括
使用惯性运动捕捉的肌肉骨模型对评估手工物料处理风险有希望. 然而,在估计脊柱和膝关节力量方面仍然存在重大不准确性,这需要进一步开发方法,以进行可靠的人体工程学评估.
科学领域:
- 生物力学 生物力学
- 人体工程学就是人体工程学.
- 职业健康 职业健康 职业健康
背景情况:
- 使用惯性运动捕获 (IMC) 和地面反应力 (GRF) 预测的肌肉骨模型为手动物料处理 (MMH) 的现场风险评估提供了潜力.
- 之前的研究强调了脊柱力估计的不准确性,其他关键结果变量的准确性仍然不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 为了评估基于IMC的肌肉骨模型估计的膝盖,肩膀和L5-S1关节反应力 (JRFs) 的准确性,与金标准的光学运动捕捉 (OMC) 和力板模型相比.
- 评估基于IMC的模型估计在各种提升条件中的一致性和绝对一致性.
主要方法:
- 基于IMC的模型中的JRF (膝盖,肩膀,L5-S1) 与基于OMC的模型中的JRF (膝盖,肩膀,L5-S1) 在19名健康受试者进行各种举重时进行了比较.
- 分析了包括水平位置 (HLs),沉积高度 (DHs) 和不对称角度 (AAs) 在内的提升变化.
- 在统计学上比较两个模型之间的一致性 (r) 和绝对一致性 (RMSE).
主要成果:
- 在L5-S1轴压缩 (AC) 和前后 (AP) 切削力,双侧膝盖JRF (RMSE 40.9-117%BW) 中发现了相当大的绝对差异.
- Glenohumeral JRF 和垂直 GRF 显示出最高的一致性和绝对一致性 (r 中位数 0.78,RMSE 7.63-34.9%BW).
- L5-S1交流力表现出不错的一致性 (r 中位数为0.80),但绝对差异显著.
结论:
- 基于IMC的肌肉骨模型显示出潜力,但面临着持续的准确性挑战,特别是脊柱和膝盖的JRF,与先前的发现保持一致.
- 需要进一步开发方法,以提高这些模型的准确性和可靠性,以便在MMH中进行全面的人体工程学评估.
更多相关视频
08:45Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
Published on: March 28, 2018
10.6K
06:52An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
7.9K
相关概念视频
Kinematic Equations - II
9.4K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
9.4K
Kinematic Equations - III
7.5K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
Using the kinematic equations,...
7.5K
