一项综合的实证和计算研究,解读寻求帮助的行为和声乐的耻辱感
Aaron R Glick1,2,3,4, Colin Jones1, Lisa Martignetti1
1School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Communications medicine
|November 9, 2024
概括
专业的语音用户面临着耻辱,影响寻求帮助. 较大的社交网络增加了声音的耻辱,而信息-动机-行为技能可以在较小的网络中减轻它.
科学领域:
- 语音和听力科学 语言和听力科学
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
- 健康心理学 心理健康心理学
背景情况:
- 专业的语音用户,包括歌手和演员,经常遇到与语音障碍相关的耻辱,导致不愿寻求医疗护理.
- 这项研究调查了这些专业人士之间的声乐耻辱,寻求帮助的行为和社交网络影响之间的相互作用.
研究的目的:
- 量化表演者的声乐耻辱和寻求帮助行为的经验.
- 预测社交网络中的同行影响如何调节这些体验.
主要方法:
- 预期在线调查收集了403名加拿大人 (200名表演者,203名对照) 的声乐耻辱和信息-动机-行为 (IMB) 技能数据.
- 一个基于代理的网络模型模拟了社会互动,以分析网络结构对耻辱和IMB流动的影响.
主要成果:
- 更大的社交网络与增加的声乐耻辱相关.
- 在较小的网络中,更高的IMB减少了总体的耻辱;在更大的网络中,这种效应减少了.
- 具有高社会耻辱和语音障碍风险的个体表现出对IMB变化的声音耻辱;极端的IMB/耻辱值加快了网络两极分化.
结论:
- 经验调查和计算建模被整合在一起,以理解超越理论框架的声音耻辱和IMB.
- 这项研究量化了耻辱,寻求健康的行为和社会影响之间的相互作用.
- 建立了一个有效的平台,开发干预措施,以减少声音障碍和其他疾病中的健康耻辱.
相关概念视频
02:16Stereotype Content Model
14.0K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.0K
02:09Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.5K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.5K
00:57Deindividuation
26.3K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.3K
00:52Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
01:04Social Facilitation
31.8K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.8K
02:40The Scientific Method
59.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.3K